this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
49 points (80.2% liked)

Memes

56207 readers
965 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

First sentence still true, it's just used by france to (badly attempt to) hide their continued colonialism.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

First sentence is 100% false, actually.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

You don't consider the GRU/Africa Corps to be neo-colonialism at the least?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

They could be part of neo-colonialism, if Russia was actively dominating and exploiting these countries financially in a manner that goes beyond trade. However, I have not seen any evidence of that, just the presence of mercenaries. Western millitaries and mercenaries are not neocolonialism itself, but the means by which neocolonialism is maintained when IMF loans and other financial tools are not sufficient.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Colonialism in a predatory, extractive economic relation. The presence of a mercenary company alone doesn't tell us what purpose they serve. Many of their clients are the same African states that have recently overthrown their neocolonial rulers in Europe, and have understandable reservations about doing business with western mercenaries at such a sensitive time.