this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
270 points (95.3% liked)

politics

30579 readers
2851 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

Edit: holy shit, these comments are insane.

Regardless of what you believe with this, Platner likely cannot win anymore. He has a week to do the right thing and drop out before he's fully locked in. If he actually gives any sort of a shit (and doesn't just want power, like rapists seeking office tend to), he needs to drop out yesterday.

This is the nail in the coffin for his campaign. It's not time to defend him no matter what, because there's still a week where a new candidate can be put into place. Instead of being mad at people not wanting to vote for him, you should start vocally supporting another candidate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 107 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

DAMMIT! After the FIRST Republican hit piece I said I don't care PLATNER is my Guy but now that there's a SECOND Republican hit piece with the EXACT same Allegation I guess I have NO CHOICE but to Vote for the People who will CONTINUE Protecting the Epstein Class!

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 73 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

Yeah, I generally agree with always believing a victim. But in this case, the person is clearly also a political operative. Waiting until just after the primary makes me immediately question her story. At the very least, it shows she cares much more about electing a Republican than she does about actually receiving justice. If she is a victim, she's also an opportunist.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

No, don't you see, she deleted every text message, Instagram DM, call record and any other corrobarating proof that could ever backup the story and never filed a police report for these awful crimes and didn't say a word for the past year because she saw that no one took the first accuser seriously because she was a proud Republican and she actually totally, like, agrees with Platner's policies and is totally a Democrat [citation needed - allegedly voted Trump last year], so she did the wise thing and waited until the 25th hour of what is arguably the determining election of giving Dems the control of senate to write a hit piece about something that happened 7 years ago and hand the election to the 29-year incumbent demonstrably guilty of much worse. It's that simple.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 weeks ago (25 children)

Just to clarify, this is a different woman from the one whose actual job is "political operative". This woman could also be timing this for political effect, but supporting Republican efforts isn't her job like the main accuser in the NYT piece.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

This woman also has text messages and emails to back up her claims.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, this one is a credible accusation

Hopefully someone progressive can replace platner if this causes his campaign to pull out

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 26 points 3 weeks ago

It won't be someone progressive. The people who would be choosing a last minute replacement are the people who didn't want him to win the primary.

There's no real viable replacement. Even if they choose someone who represented the policies the voters supported in him, which they won't do, Platner is the only one with the justification of being chosen by voters to justify people who didn't vote for him supporting him in the general. Anyone else is opening the door for finding some difference to now mean the candidate isn't the choice of the party.

And that's in the dreamland where the insiders choose a spare charismatic progressive outsider they had hanging around rather than someone who's in their club.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

Rape isn't the same accusation nor the same suspect accuser

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The woman came forward to the NYT earlier to get on record but held back the story until another accuser came forward. She has contemporaneous emails with her therapist dealing with the fallout and people in her life she told the story to around the time it happened who can confirm it, as well as woman she warned after cutting contact with Platner. These allegations are as credible as they get and some of the reactions to this story are frankly disgusting.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/06/graham-platner-sexual-assault-allegation-00987737

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You misread the article you linked.

The woman, a 41-year-old Maine resident named Jenny Racicot, detailed the alleged incident to POLITICO in three interviews over the past two weeks. POLITICO also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office.

Politico reviewed:

  1. Emails with her therapist (no date mentioned.)
  2. Contemporary emails with a friend (though the name of this friend has been kept secret.)

Any ambiguity is removed by the later sentence:

Racicot showed POLITICO recent emails with her therapist in which Racicot explained she was talking to the media about her relationship with Platner and the “sa/rape,”

Nowhere in the very article you linked does it mention contemporaneous therapist notes. You are spreading misinformation.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Fyi Politico is openly Zionist and told their staff to leave if they’re not. Why do people treat them as legit. I certainly don’t.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] speaksintv@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The double standards for each party is absolutely stunning.

Anyone even know off the top their head how many allegations, some even confirmed in FBI testimony, Don chomo has?

Not to mention the rape scrotus said he had to pay out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Coming out exactly a week before the candidate can be switched makes this fishy...

If they wanted a real investigation, they'd have said it earlier. And if he is guilty, he can just pull a Cuomo and run anyways.

But if he's innocent and cares most about beating Republicans, he might drop anyways like Al Franken.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yuuurp. And 90% of people (even on here) are eating it up. Subverting primaries is a Dem past time

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

If it's this easy to sling allegations around then progressive candidates everywhere are fucked.

Why bother voting when you can just accuse a candidate of rape? It's super effective, apparently. Unless they're a republican, at least...

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I will believe the accusations by default but if he does not drop out, Mainers still need to choose the rapist (accused, alleged or not) over the supreme-rapist enabler who will help remove the right for women to vote and have bodily autonomy, continue reckless and expensive wars, subsidizing billionaire excess, and send US taxpayer money to Israel's genocide while starving Maine. If Platner drops out, more likely than not, a replacement like David Costello may write many words in opposition to Collins' party, but push for little action.

I think Platner has 48 hours to research to find if AIPAC or outside groups (not including Cheyenne Hunt & Reckoning Action, Racicot reached out to them supposedly) have unduly influenced the details or timing of this. Some kind of credible evidence to put the evidence behind the allegations in doubt would be needed else this whole campaign is possibly sunk. CNN's Tapper is happy to jump on this story asking leading questions. ETA: And many outlets that would decry HasanAbi as an anti-Semite are readily citing him speaking against Platner.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Platner can't win. The accuser has corroborated contemporaneous communications. He's just going to lose.

Finding this out now is a gift - he can drop out by the 13th. Rs would love to have kept this hidden until then. Now he can be replaced by the 27th (I think?)

Jackson is being floated as an alternative, but I'd love to see Heather Cox Richardson drafted

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Haha, that would be great, but there is no way in hell HCR has interest in that position.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

If Platner wants to defend himself publicly on this, and/or keep running, and/or sue the accuser for libel, he's free to do any or all of that. As anyone who's been around for a few cycles know, its pretty common for candidates and other public figures, when they first reach a certain terminal level of attention or fame, to get a wide range of accusations on business, personal matters, drug use, and past sexual behavior. Just because these appear to be conveniently timed politically, is not evidence for or against their veracity. If there is no actual juice to these accusations, then dealing with people who lob bombs like that into the middle of campaigns is a well-worn playbook that thousands of politicians have run and won with, and he'll be fine. If.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 weeks ago

“The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

― Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

Just hold a lottery for the senate / house seat. No politics, no filtering.

[–] PurpleHawkeye619@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is why you disqualify the guy with the nazi tattoo immediately....

Anyone with judgements that bad us going to have more skeletons in the closet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 3 weeks ago

The first one might have been a Republican hit piece, but this one is a lot more credible. The woman warns another woman about him years before any political stuff in chats.

But hey run the nazi-tattoo guy XD what could possibly go wrong.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Stick a fork in him, he's done. The endorsements will never come back, and there's no way other politicians can recover from pulling an endorsement and giving it right back again.

Agreed though, the timing is SUPER sus.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sad situation. Either way AIPAC won America lost

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinto@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Yet another purity test failed, why can't we tolerate sex pest Nazis?! Is nothing good enough for you leftists?

First you don't want genocide and war crimes, now you don't support rapists! We all know she is a filthy liar! No people in positions of power would do such a thing. Except for all the ones in office who do. But those guys don't count! They're Republicans!

If being a rapist gets you cancelled by the left, then the left would rather lose than let a rapist in office!

Clearly she's lying about all of it. Never believe a single woman when they confess they were raped by someone I like. That's what MSNBC told me when Biden was being questioned for his actions and defended Clarance Thomas to enter the Supreme Court, known sex pest.

This is just filthy slander, just vote Blue no matter who he rapes!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

People let some Nazi merc slide because he broke out the working class starter pack dialogue choices. We need to return to context clues and some basic morals. Having a Nazi tattoo is instantly disqualifying in any party but the Republican one.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Here's the only picture I can find of the tattoo, and it's a video of him singing Wrecking ball by Miley Cyrus, so bonus:

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/graham-platner-tattoo-row-explained-all-about-the-ss-totenkopf-aka-the-nazi-deaths-head-tattoo/ar-AA1OUdmb

It's a big black blob that I don't think I'd clock as a tottenkopf, and Ive unfortunately seen a lot of Nazi tattoos.

A drunk marine 20 years picking a "skull and bones" off a flash wall in an eastern European country is 100% plausible. I spent too much time around junior marines as well and they really don't ask any questions, they just go with shit.

Picking a tattoo a 12 year old would think is badass and not trying to find out what it means first 100% lines up with a Marines first deployment.

But like I said, I've unfortunately had to interact with full on actual Nazis in the past, similar to that timeframe even. The guys that intentionally get Nazi tattoos don't just stop at one and theyve left a long paper trail of their racism long before that point.

If he got it cuz he was a Nazi, then it wouldn't be the only obvious piece of evidence. A shit ton of people would have came out and said he's a Nazi.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

+1. Everyone says Nazi tattoo like it was a swastika lol. The Death Head was pretty well neutralized in 2007. It was in the same tier as barber wire, just an edgy thing people did. Call of Duty offered it as a official emblem you could put on your playercard lol. The ADL didn't even consider it a hate symbol until 2020.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tubthumper@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I genuinely do not know what to believe anymore.

Edit: the timing and optics might be poor, but I at least believe we should consider this credible. Platner should have to defend himself here, not her.

Edit edit: Trauma has no timeline.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

This is an intentional strategy that's reaching fruition. There's a threshold of false information being spread-- surprisingly low-- where people begin to distrust all information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FE80@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The Democratic establishment would rather lose to Susan Collins than win with an outsider candidate. The fact that Bill Clinton is accepted in polite society and Platner has to be banished demonstrates that sexual scandals are a cudgel to be wielded selectively.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Called this. Haha down voters.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] webadict@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (77 children)

There are a lot of people in here who do not seem to know a story of someone that was sexually assaulted. I would hope to those of you that think this is bullshit to ask a woman in your life if they know someone that has been assaulted, and what they did. Because 99% of women will know someone or be someone like the woman this is referring to.

Her story is pretty believable and the actions taken are similar to many other people who have been assaulted: Cut ties and warn others. And that is exactly what she did. She knew Platner before this occurred and were even having a sexual relationship (this was from a series of interviews with Graham's past relationships.) I think the most damning part of this is that she doesn't appear to have a political agenda. She seems to agree with his messages.

As much as the average person immediately goes to the defense of the person they like more, this seems very credible. it is entirely likely that Planter may not have even been conscious of his actions, having been far too drunk. That isn't really an excuse, though, and I do think his campaign should be finding a replacement ASAP. They can still run a progressive candidate, but holy fuck, they need to move fast.

Sexual assault should be treated as the disqualifying event that it is. I understand questioning the sincerity of the victim, but there are too many things that make me believe her, and if it is true, that should absolutely disqualify him from office.

load more comments (77 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

The guy with the nazi tattoo on his chest turned out to be a POS? What? This has to be some sort of mistake. This seems so uncharacteristic. Sometimes, reality truly is stranger than fiction.

Also a big fuck you to everyone that defended him. We told you so. We told you so, and you didn't listen. You people are so dense. Anyway, talk to you with the next obvious Obama/Letterman/Planter situation, where you'll make the exact same fucking mistake, because this time it really is different.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›