Bustedknuckles

joined 2 years ago
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

George Conway had an interesting "fix" that gets around the constitutional obstacles where older justices are relegated to something like emeritus positions and new justices are appointed to the main bench to take their place

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

From what I could see, nurses were pushed to work in hazardous conditions as "heroes" and "essential". A cohort left because the risk/reward was bad in a situation where supply/demand was low, some then got huge pay bumps to be travel nurses. In short: capital interests exploited nurses willing to work for non-monetary compensation (e.g. clapping, their own sense of compassion, etc). The nurses willing to demand more pay generally got it

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

From what I can tell, she's doing great so far - but it's still pretty early

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

That's the seat Kat Abughazaleh (sp?) is running for. And she Definitely doesn't take aipac money. In this environment, I think Dems are going to pay more attention to primaries this time around

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was going to send a DM to cowbee, but it may be worth knowng for others. I'm a bit older and may be a "normie" leftist with moderate anti-cap views and have unexamined prejudices about the USSR. I liked what I read from Lenin/Marx (one work each, i know!) but don't like the reality of what I know of Stalin so don't want that association. After reading some more, I'll reexamine the USSR prejudices. So thanks to cowbee and folks who didn't assume malice

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Civil and Fair, so thanks. I'll also pay more attention to the instance in the future if only to not be so baffled. Even if folks consider the Soviets progressive for the time, my 2 cents is that tying modern anticapitalism to the realities of USSR, especially Stalinism, does a disservice to progressive movements and even Marxism. But as you say, it's a minority opinion, so I'll accept my downvotes. Thanks again

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's true that some landlords would jack up rent rather than sell - especially as some people are stuck renting in a tighter market. Ideally you could separate corporate landlords from onesie-twosie landlords? A big issue is that landlords and banks are happy to artificially tighten the market with vacant housing. I think Vancouver Canada had a law that levied taxes on unoccupied housing - I should look into how that went

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

I think that was in the original text but was removed before passage because Texas has already passed their gerrymander

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've seen the idea floated that we jack up property taxes, exempting owner-occupied homes. I don't think it's that bad for seniors to downsize and increase housing liquidity and let people who want to get more out of local communities for their tax burden. We're facing a lot of resistance to taxes and our schools are getting disrupted by budget shortfalls. I'm happy to pay more because I have kids who use the parks, sidewalks, schools, library, etc. a lot of seniors use less and don't want to pay more. So maybe low-but-nonzero property tax for owner-occupied, and high tax for landlords like me!

 

An exercise in why you shouldn't worry too much about polls

 

Almost as good as Lichtman's keys!

view more: next ›