this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
128 points (100.0% liked)

Photography

7667 readers
618 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Taken in Emmetten, Switzerland.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Creativity@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

If you feel like crossposting, !birding@lemmy.world would like your picture!

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That’s not a kite, it’s clearly some sort of bird.

/s

[–] dave@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

They just edited out the wires. See !birdsarentreal@lemmy.world

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Oh, so that's what Tobias looked like

[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago

Wow, the lighting is really great! Incredible!

[–] wieson@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

Beautiful! (But it's milvus milvus)
Red kite is my favourite predator bird

[–] Celestial6370@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This looks so good. Did you have to crop in on the original or is this raw from the camera? I feel like tracking something moving quickly would be hard

[–] Grothorious@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Thank you, glad you like it!

I cropped in a bit, and it helps a lot that my lens has shake reduction (i used Nikon D500 body plus 200-500 f2.8 nikkor lens). And yes, it's hard to shoot fast objects, honestly it was more luck than anything, i normally shoot more stationary stuff :)

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Man the D500 is such a beast for wildlife photography. I wish they have an equivalent for the Z series.

[–] Celestial6370@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Lucky for you, lucky for us :)

I also have no idea what any of those lens details mean but thank you for the detailed response. I didn't know a lens could have anti shake, does that work similarly to a smartphone sensor's optical image stabilization? I guess you could compensate for movement with the final destination of the light or the path it travels through. I had never thought about it on a bigger camera, but when the sensor is scaled up that large, it would have to be easier to adjust through the lens than to move that entire sensor quickly.