this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
416 points (96.6% liked)

News

38338 readers
2353 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2002, Maine became the first state to implement a statewide laptop program to some grade levels. Then-governor Angus King saw the program as a way to put the internet at the fingertips of more children, who would be able to immerse themselves in information.

By that fall, the Maine Learning Technology Initiative had distributed 17,000 Apple laptops to seventh graders across 243 middle schools. By 2016, those numbers had multiplied to 66,000 laptops and tablets distributed to Maine students.

King’s initial efforts have been mirrored across the country. In 2024, the U.S. spent more than $30 billion putting laptops and tablets in schools. But more than a quarter-century and numerous evolving models of technology later, psychologists and learning experts see a different outcome than the one King intended. Rather than empowering the generation with access to more knowledge, the technology had the opposite effect.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 2 points 26 minutes ago

It sounds like it's false, but even if it were true, companies like Fortune are working hard to make it true. They want suckers who don't think, who don't remember, who can perform high level labor at almost no cost, so the rich can get richer.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

Kids these days

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yeah thats click bait.

None of tbe cognitive assessment tools we have are reliable in any scientific way. It's all IQ test level of fundamental misunderstanding of human intelligence.

That being said there is 1 truth in the article - we do need to address learning to ways of human actually learn. Laptops or books or whatever it's mostly irrelevant. Grades and exams and class of 20 people is not how humans learn. The entire education industry needs to be fundamentally reshaped.

Unpopular opinion: AI is the right tool for education revolution and many people are already taking advantage of this tool while education institutions close their eyes and push paper tests. LLMs are never going away.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 48 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

As a society, we chose to only teach ONE FUCKING GENERATION how to use technology and then went "well, young people 'just understand' technology, we don't need to teach it anymore" and then somehow decided to just give all the kids a fucking tablet or laptop and assume they would LEARN THROUGH OSMOSIS I GUESS? Meanwhile we are defunding education across the country to absolutely shameful lows. (yes, I'm focused on the USA - I doubt "Cooney Horvath" is basing this broad generalization meant to scare people into buying his books on a study of ALL CHILDREN ALL OVER THE WORLD) AND THEN we let tech-bro-oligarchs decide EVERYTHING related to tech for two entire fucking decades and are just SHOCKED they did the thing that was best for profits, not the children (whose lives it was actively ruining for profit).

BUT YES, JARED HORNY CORVATH, your astute observations PROVE it was the fault of the LAPTOP that the next generations are "INHERANTLY DUMBER" (feels like a dog whistle, I dunno for what - but it's trying to justify something, I can feel it in my bones).

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

THIS. PREACH. I couldn't say it better myself. Abso-friggin-lutely.

"Technology" is SUCH an abused word by these absolute simpletons. "Technology" didn't cause this. They did what they always do: They thoughtlessly expect their false god, The Market, to somehow organically solve the problem of education and human betterment, if only we sacrifice enough money to it.

Giving kids laptops? MAYBE, right? Huge MAYBE. Ask any generation if elementary schoolers on unsupervised internet connections was a good friggin idea.

But tablets and Chromebooks?! GTFO. Right out. Those things are barely "technology." They're consumption devices optimized primarily to make ongoing profit from their users.

In 95% of cases, I'll wager, nobody's getting hands-on learning from a friggin iPad or Chromebook. Trying to "replace" standard desktops with those things collectively killed a huge chunk of our cognitive abilities as a society.

we let tech-bro-oligarchs decide EVERYTHING related to tech for two entire fucking decades and are just SHOCKED they did the thing that was best for profits, not the children (whose lives it was actively ruining for profit).

ONE. HUNDRED. PERCENT.

So many usability decisions and standards were coming from public univerisities and publicly transparent nonprofits. (Why we have an Internet that's open source at its core, for instance. But I have a lot to research...) Even privately, standards were about the benefit of the users, rather than

"Let's copy every decision Apple makes because look at their stonk price and slavishly drooling fanbase."

My mom used to be awesome with our Windows 95 Packard Bell. She used internet forums, she figured out eBay when it was brand new, she ran DXDiag when games weren't working. She knew how to freaking DEFRAG the thing.

Now she struggles and panics to do the most basic thing if it's not 1-step on her iPhone. It's tragic. Heartbreaking. And I hate them for it.

We let the filthy marketers from packaged goods and casino industries run amok in tech, and that's how we got here : Tech is largely not the incredible new tools we dreamed of to live better lives, instead its often closer smoking and gambling .

If you let marketers take over anything , unregulated, it inevitably takes the form of toxic vice, because our poorest choices make them the richest.

Mainstream technology doesn't connect us, it isolates us. It doesn't educate us, it actively endeavors to make us stupid . Every freaking bit of bandwidth reaching our eyeballs on the mainstream net is dedicated to reducing "friction" to rob our wallets and personal data.

I'm INFURIATED that most people can't even handle organizing a file system anymore. Only private schools seem to teach actual computer education, and they all bought into this stupid lie that the "future" is cloud subscriptions served on brainrot e-waste.

I feel like we need to start "desktop computer clubs" or something. Seeing this crap like they're trying to extinguish the personal computer is basically a declaration of war in my book...

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 13 points 4 hours ago

In 2002, Maine became the first state to implement a statewide laptop program to some grade levels. Then-governor Angus King saw the program as a way to put the internet at the fingertips of more children, who would be able to immerse themselves in information.

As the great Douglas Adams once wrote: "This has generally been considered a bad idea."

2002 though. I sympathize. The internet was different and more human. He must've thought they were giving kids freedom to access NatGeo and Wikipedia.

...We were more optimistic about the internet then.

...But they failed to take into account that they were releasing children into an unregulated world of predatory marketer barons making millions hand-over-fist by hijacking attention.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Unrelated but I am pretry annoyed articles can refer to age groups as "gen z" or "millenial."

It's not some universally agreed number. They could just say "kids aged 12-24." It's more empirical.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Students aren't being disadvantaged by the availability or even the reliance on technology.

They're being disadvantaged by not being taught (or in most cases even allowed) to interact with said technology in challenging and enlightening ways.

Would expect nothing better than such jumping to shallow conclusions from the chronically out of touch rag Fortune, though.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Exactly.

As if, what, are kids gonna be making their own websites with HTML by just handing them some content-consumption appliance? Yeah, right!

I know some kids who are actually using technology well, and learning valuable skills, building their own gaming machines and stuff.

They're usually in private school or educated households though. As usual, everybody else "fell through."

We need to bring proper computing education back, but Techbro Valley hijacked our schools to train future dependent idiot consumers. Kids have been getting robbed.

It breaks my heart. I had to work in a public library for a long time as a computer lab assistant, and it was soul-sucking how many people of ANY generation were just absolutely clueless. Functionally illiterate. Zero problem solving neural pathways.

It didn't have to be like this. I'm very passionate about this subject, apparently lol, but I have no idea what to actually do about it...

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

YES. The only piece of technology ever thaught by schools are a fixed set of google & microsoft products.

It would've been so great if for at least once say "We don't have microsoft word tasks today, we don't have google docs tasks today, follow the pdf guide in kstars to chart these heavenly bodies and learn some astronomy instead."

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

and welcome to 'short attention span theater"

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There's no scientific proof of "shortened attention spans".

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Wow, a generation of kids dumber than their parents. Kids of MAGAt parents must be a sight to behold.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 68 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (7 children)

I have a degree in computer engineering. I have been coding since the 80’s.

I learn better with pencil and paper. Most people do. Schools need to go back to that. Have computer labs but don’t do everything on computers all damn day.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago

That's just not true. People don't learn with pencil or computer better - a single tool does not shape the learning experience. Sure pencil has positive effects stimulating muscles while learning but it has a billion of negative effects too.

[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 8 hours ago

I'm 23 and got a CS degree last year. When I was in highschool my CS teacher had us writing Java on paper with pencil. At the time I thought it was the stupidest thing but in hindsight there definitely are certain benefits to it. The best CS professor I had in college was also having us do certain things with pencil and paper and he strictly forbid it being done any other way.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Educational studies have backed this up. You learn more when writing than typing and by reading print media than digital. The digital tools should still exist but you also need to use the analog ones.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I get the writhing because of muscle memory but reading is reading...

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Books are tactile and involve more of your perception.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

LOL what on earth if FORTUNE of all places doing publishing an article on this?

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Fortune:

Making old people with money feel vindicated, justified in their ageism, and superior...after they sabotaged the next several generations for their own short-term gain.

Up next: "These top megacorps will bring back slave child labor. Could that bump up your portfolio a few points?"

▶️ Fortunate_Son.wav

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

You get it!

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 227 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (25 children)

Mostly posting this because holy shit what a jump to blame schools distributing laptops being the cause and not psychologically addictive social media algorithms having a total domination of their attention

Definitely nothing to do with the fact that schools giving out laptops disproportionately benefits less wealthier families

[–] BossDj@piefed.social 1 points 52 minutes ago

THANK YOU. As a teacher, this guy made me rage hard. And even harder when older teachers who already hate technology latched on to it as an excuse. Show me evidence for fucks sake when middle school teachers are ALSO now teaching multiple subject areas, have way less prep time, the school has less money, are also responsible for live online grading and access to assignments.

Also, I love fediverse. Rational mind heaven

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 74 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

Giving kids laptops was a great idea. Letting corporations use those laptops to brainwash our children was probably not.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

I make a comment saying the title here, like a week ago, and its controversial.

I say 'if you don't understand this that's because you're not familiar with current stats and papers'.

Look.

Everybody is scrambling to actually explain the causal mechanism(s).

... The observed effect though, is so broad and obvious and undeniable, that that's why everyone is scrambling to try and explain it.

Personally, my inclination is that for-profit, advertisement-oriented social media apps are the 'cigarettes' of the digital age... because they are literally precision designed to hijack your attention, cause addiction via hijacking your dopamine/reward neurochemistry, prey on and exploit all your innate/subconscious insecurities, and they reward and amplify convenience, outrage and excess.

But that's just a hypothesis. Again, what's undeniable is that... we have, broadly, peaked.

Unless of course we can figure out how to reverse that, and then actually implement whatever needs to be done, to actually reverse it.

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Fully back up your theory for the main cause. Screen time has vastly taken over the times of students as their brains are developing and by and large it feeds the least enriching, least challenging content as it has the highest propensity for addiction (under the guise of user retention)

I predict we'll view this experiment with the same confused disgust as we do when we hear that doctors used to prescribe cocaine for pretty much anything. The software engineers who aided any of this are going to be ashamed of their work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

I don't think it's tablets and laptops that caused the decline as much as what they grant access to. The conspiratorial side to me is dying to believe that the massive Gen AI push by the government and businesses is not only about the money, but also about producing a dumber generation.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I absolutely agree with you.

Computers used to be multi-purpose tools. They existed to benefit their users and make tasks easier.

Now their mainstream "considered ideal" form is just a constant dope-feed that drains your wallet and sells your every waking moment to anonymous bidders. The less you can rely on your own brain, the more you'll pay to rely on theirs.

Computers and those who understand them run society now, and there's definitely an obvious push toward techno-feudalism. A class of "Those Who Understand", served by a forever disadvantaged class of "Those Who Do Not."

A stark contrast can be seen by using any Linux machine, for instance. It's there for you. It is a tool that expects you to gain understanding and familiarity as you use it, rather than handing you all the answers without challenging you to think about anything.

As you gain familiarity, simply using the computer itself feels educating, it gets fun. You are rewarded for trying things by getting smarter.

Compare to any "normie OS."

"No." It says. "You're too stupid for any of this. Pay your subscription and ask Ai maybe."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The dark ages didn't begin because the library of Alexandria fell, but because it was allowed to fall.

This is fundamentally our fault

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›