this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
370 points (98.7% liked)

movies

3705 readers
318 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 99 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Shame they didn't call it "the quest for more money."

[–] Antium@lemmy.world 70 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

On the first reveal trailer Mel Brooks explained that he already found the money. The Money

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but has he found the more money yet?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Can’t go wrong with seconds on space balls day!

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 51 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd rather "Spaceballs 3: The Search for the Lost Sequel"

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Spaceballs 2: Somehow Spaceballs Returned

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Well, the first movie said the sequel would be Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money, so I'd go with Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's a 40 year old joke at this point. I'm pretty sure Mel Brooks has more pride in his work than to repeatedly himself. Unless it was truly funny.

[–] CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Combing the desert is repeating an old joke too.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If I were to defend it, I'd say that the joke in this case is that they're still combing the desert 40 years later, which adds a little new humour to it.

Not sure I really want to defend it, though. Can't say this poster excites me. But it would excite me less if the subtitle were a purely nostalgia driven reference as well.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, if i hear him personally saying "ain't found shit" for a second time, 40 years older, i will die in peace.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And it needs to be Tim Russ again.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

“I may be ….. combing the desert again..!!!”, Russ posted, directly referencing his memorable scene from the first Spaceballs.

Lol of course

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 13 points 1 week ago

It's a setup for a joke with 40 years of payoff.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A lot of his later movies were just repeated jokes from his older ones. Men in Tights reused a bunch of old gags, including the title song, which was "Jews in Space" from the epiloge of History of the World Part 1.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember when the combed tge desert and people found that funny? Anyway, here is the same thing.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The comb thing was funny in the literal joke sense. It was a joke, subverting expectations, playing off a pun, and had prop/visual comedy, too. It was solid if silly.

This cover though ... this is just stupid nostalgia bait.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

HAHAHAH

The first time I saw this movie that line made me laugh so hard I almost hyperventilated.

It was so out of the blue and funny!

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Amazing how many strong opinions exist for something we've got no clue how they're doing it

I'm worried, too. But this nonsense about how it sucks? We absolutely don't know that. At least not yet. Yeesh

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can't deny it is pretty disheartening that they went with a literal copy-paste of a scene from the first movie as a poster. Pure nostalgia bait.

Yes, we have no idea what the movie will be like, but this particular poster is definitely an example of a product being done for all the the wrong reasons. Whether it reflects on the movie itself or just the marketing department is another matter.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean... that's true. But it's a MARKETING poster, put together by the marketing team - not the writers or creatives on the movie. Its intent is to get people to remember the original so they come to see this one. It's not supposed to be a high concept art piece. They'd be stupid not to lean into nostalgia.

What matters is the final film, and if it does the same thing.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

You can’t deny it is pretty disheartening

I… do not agree. A poster that triggers nostalgia? It tells me nothing about the project.

It might be shitty, it might be fantastic.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Welcome to movie criticism of the new millenium.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Going by History of the World sequel, I'll wait for the reviews.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I was not expecting all the angry people. Isn’t this like the second sequel he’s ever done?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes!

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Keep firing, assholes!

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Guys they're obviously parodying the Dinsey star wars reboot by reusing the same jokes /s

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn't think we had much iconic sci-fi to parody these days.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hell, if they just focused on the SW sequels, I’d consider that enough.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The sw sequels are already self parodying.

[–] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

The true joke here is that Spaceballs 2 will be the best Star Wars sequel since Star Wars Episode 6.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 6 points 2 weeks ago

Tough call, most of it really sucks anymore, so I guess it's easy to parody?

(That said, there's been a LOT of sucky sci-fi forever, so...)

[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Don't watch it in cinemas. It is pure nostalgiaslop. Vote with your wallet and go see new movies instead. If you are curious, use alternative methods to watch it instead.

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago

They hated him because he told them the truth.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Airfried@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Whats even to parody at this point?

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Well i dont know about you guys but i am hopeful, theres plenty of material that wasnt covered in the first spaceballs, and thats not including the new disney sequels.
Wait till its out before i judge.

[–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What about history of the world part 2? Jews in space!

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They actually did that as a Hulu series a few years ago.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was so incredibly disappointed :(

[–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

I have seen it yet and I'm already disappointment. To be fair a lot of Mel Brooks stuff doesn't really hold up in today's social climate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›