this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
138 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30470 readers
2775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] celeste@kbin.earth 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Investigators said that the two women initiated a verbal confrontation with the employees before taking a picture of their vehicles and walking away.

At this point, investigators said that Booth grabbed his personally owned pistol and fired a single shot in the direction of the women, hitting one of them in the lower body. He then got into his vehicle and drove away before he could be detained.

Committed the crime of hurting his feelings and then leaving peacefully. At least she's still alive.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Officers located him and arrested him on suspicion of charges, including:

  • Attempted second-degree murder
  • First-degree assault
  • Attempted first-degree assault
  • Felony menacing
  • Unlawful carrying of a concealed weapon

The woman was taken to the hospital with reported non-life-threatening injuries.

So, it sounds like he was quickly arrested by the real police.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I'm glad this happened, but let's see if any of those charges actually stick.

I strongly suspect that they will not and that this is all for theatrics.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

theyre just getting emboldened cuz you wont fight back. taking the moral high ground doesn't work against an opponent who has no morals.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It blows me away to see POC working for ice....

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 day ago

No war but a class war.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Dude would have loved being a slave catcher.

[–] MrSelfDestruct@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago

And being delusional that they won't be next after they get all the immigrants.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This left-wing violence is out of control.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

Wow, he looks happy with how his life is going!

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the only reason theyre not protecting him is so obvious. Fuck ice fuck the us

[–] Grilipper54@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are also saying the shooter isn't ICE but GEO. I'm not sure what that is or if DHS is lying about the shooter.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago

GEO Group is a prison contractor that's been hired by ICE to build, run, and maintain their facilities. The shooter is an employee of a private corporation but the corporation he works for is on the public dime. ICE isn't protecting him like they protect their own employees because as private security he will be held accountable as an individual rather than having the agency or even the private corporation he works for held accountable. They're more than happy to throw one guy under the bus to avoid accountability for themselves, and while they can't do that with ICE agents they can with private security.