I'm perfectly fine with this if it doesn't involve destroying the Internet in general like OSA, but I don't have high hopes. These laws aren't about the kids at all. We've had parental control software for decades, but instead of utilizing that kind of tech, improving upon it and targeting children, governments target adults and demand they fork over their biometric data and IDs.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Why don't they want children discussing sweeping.
It's a witch hunt
If I correctly remember euro LSV law, this puts France in the interesting position of their children being allowed to drive certain types of car at 14 but not allowed online until 15
those are what we call "moped cars" in finland, not sure what the english term for them is
basically a moped in a car body, goes only up to 45km/h.
more of a moped than an actual car
not sure what the english term for them is
US/CA calls them Low Speed Vehicles or LSVs.
They are mostly useless for your average person here, as they can't (legally) keep up with traffic speeds on the majority of city streets and aren't allowed on our incredible excess of highways. You still need a full license too.
There is only one domestic manufacturer I believe, which mostly sells them to universities and as golf carts
You need to have the right infrastructure for them, and places that have it are the rare exception (example: Peachtree City, GA).
Wanna bet Meta bought the lawmakers off?
Why would meta want to do that? Teenagers are a huge source of revenue for Meta.
They want a surefire way to ID everyone. An internet ID is how you properly implement a teenage ban. They also avoid legal liability when countries expect them to show that they are not serving ads and content to children.
This increases the value of their collected data and the value of their adds.
The real way to keep children safe is to ban personal data gathering and making social media unprofitable. The alternative is federated social media. We don't want incentives to mess with algorithms. We don't want profiling of people. We don't want ID theft. We don't want centralisation.
But we want capitalism! Hoorah!
This is awful. We have to fight back
When the markets crash..... They are going all the way.... the pump and dump will eventualy break the engine.
THOSE THAT WANT TO SAVE THE CHILDREN HARM THE CHILDREN. THE WESTERN WORLD IS THE DOG OF THE CAPITAIST AND FASCIST IN NATURE. Reationary plebs do not live in democracies. LEAVE ALL BIG TECH PLATFORMS NOW