this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
118 points (97.6% liked)

News

23301 readers
3751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rates of routine childhood vaccination hit a 10-year low in 2023. That, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, puts about 250,000 kindergartners at risk for measles, which often leads to hospitalization and can cause death. In recent weeks, an infant and two young children have been hospitalized amid an ongoing measles outbreak in Philadelphia that spread to a day care center.

It's a dangerous shift driven by a critical mass of people who now reject decades of science backing the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines. State by state, they've persuaded legislators and courts to more easily allow children to enter kindergarten without vaccines, citing religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs.

Growing vaccine hesitancy is just a small part of a broader rejection of scientific expertise that could have consequences ranging from disease outbreaks to reduced funding for research that leads to new treatments. "The term 'infodemic' implies random junk, but that's wrong," said Peter Hotez, a vaccine researcher at Baylor College of Medicine in Texas. "This is an organized political movement, and the health and science sectors don't know what to do."

Changing views among Republicans have steered the relaxation of childhood vaccine requirements, according to the Pew Research Center. Whereas nearly 80% of Republicans supported the rules in 2019, fewer than 60% do today. Democrats have held steady, with about 85% supporting. Mississippi, which once boasted the nation's highest rates of childhood vaccination, began allowing religious exemptions last summer. Another leader in vaccination, West Virginia, is moving to do the same.

An anti-science movement picked up pace as Republican and Democratic perspectives on science diverged during the pandemic. Whereas 70% of Republicans said that science has a mostly positive impact on society in 2019, less than half felt that way in a November poll from Pew. With presidential candidates lending airtime to anti-vaccine messages and members of Congress maligning scientists and pandemic-era public health policies, the partisan rift will likely widen in the run-up to November's elections.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 18 points 9 months ago

Anti-science misinformation is something that affects my relationships with numerous people in my life.

Empathy and patience seem to be the only response that has any positive impact, but it simply isn't enough to combat the massive amount of indoctrination driving these beliefs.

Ugh. It's so frustrating and I feel helpless so often. And things just seem to get worse. 😭

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"We have a miracle medication that will save virtually everyone, and it's free!" - Medical Science

"Fuck you, I'll let my kids die you socialist Lib!" - we all know who, probably

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

"HCQ is a miracle drug that They don't want you to know about" -same people

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is an organized political movement, and the health and science sectors don’t know what to do.

When a target is chosen for attack, the method of attack chosen will be designed around any resources they have and reactions they can take. This is an advantage conferred by the attacker having initiative, they can put much more thought and planning into exactly how they want to execute their attack, and can try to predict and preemptively deal with likely responses. Where a defender is stuck on defense, and has to try to spread their attention out to try to predict and guard against a wide multitude of potential attacks, if they're even expecting attack in the first place.

Defenders are frequently defeated by this mechanism.

Defenders have advantages of their own, though, one of which is a natural moral high ground. Where an attacker can make a specific plan, concentrate their force, and strike where the defense is weakest, a defender can frequently call for and receive reinforcements.

And that is what we're seeing. An organized attack, and pleas for help from the defenders. And if we value their services, I think we'd best honor the call. How, then...? Grassroots civic engagement, of course, wherever the opportunity presents. Unless you can think up some sort of tech solution.

It's funny, the fascists tend to think that all the militaristic-trained thinkers are on their side, but that's not actually true.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I'm so tired of pretending we need to take these idiots seriously. Make vaccination a requirement for attending public school and cut all funding for private schools. If you really want to send a message then start allowing hospitals to refuse treatment to people who are unvaccinated against said diseases without a valid medical exemption. Let them do their own research as they're so fond of saying.

Society has to stop acting like every individual opinion is worthy of equal consideration. That simply isn't true. We are all worse off for allowing people who obviously don't understand medicine to make rules about practicing medicine.

[–] conquer4@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why does trump's rabidly supportive base hate vaccines, and not take the trump vaccine?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I still remember Trump taking credit for the vaccine during one of his rallies an they even booed him!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not all that worried about the COVID anti-vaxxers. What worries me is what those people and people they can convince will do when a more contagious and more deadly pandemic happens.