this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
249 points (98.8% liked)

196

6615 readers
2107 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

its a shame how the british govt treated him, he was an extraordinary man

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The Turing test only measures one thing: how well a given algorithm can pass the Turing test. It's been mythologized to the point of irrelevance.

While I have people's attention: "Schrödinger's cat" is the polar opposite of what people think it is. Erwin Schrödinger hated and strongly disagreed with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which holds that quantum mechanical systems are indeterministic until observed or measured. He did not come up with the "Schrödinger's cat" thought experiment to explain superposition -- he invented it to illustrate, in a macroscopic and intuitive way, why he thought Bohr's and Heisenberg's interpretation was stupid.

Also, Bohr is a fake ass bitch and a fucking redditor before reddit. Einstein was right.

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

You make a good point and then circle back to what we all already knew anyways: Einstein was right.

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

I still remember the first time i learned the intention behind schrödingers cat and i was so relieved because that's how i always saw it

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So, according to Schrödinger, the cat is either dead or alive, and you just don't know its state until you open the box? Is that it?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What you described is more or less consistent with Schrödinger's views.

In the Copenhagen interpretation, a quantum system is described by a wave function (the probability density of all of its possible states; the cat is maybe dead and maybe alive) until it is observed, at which point it collapses into one of its possible states (the cat is definitively dead or definitively alive).

As far as I can tell, in Schrödinger's views, there is no superposition and there is no collapse, and a system is described directly by its wave function, which changes over time.

But this is all just interpretation. I don't even know where to start looking for empirical evidence that supports one or the other, or whether there's even a point philosophizing about it.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just because he was gay doesn’t mean he’d like Grindr. There’s very little to like about Grindr, honestly. The ads are incredibly invasive, it tracks the everliving hell out of you, and wants you to pay exorbitant prices to avoid that BS.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

LLMs do not consistently pass Turing tests they're often obviously fake

[–] jaschop@awful.systems 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

2 fictional men and a depiction of a typical AI booster