this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
743 points (99.2% liked)

Work Reform

17064 readers
2520 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

Sounds like business per usual for Americans.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is the system working as designed. I'm not sure how anyone missed that.

And while tariffs were in place Amazon was passing on those savings, or lack thereof, to customers. So they mostly didn't see any losses from paying the tariffs. Then they get refunded, and then it's less that the government actually paid Amazon anything, they just gave them a reason to charge people extra in shipping, for no good reason.

Whether those costs were rendered in the shipping cost on Amazon, or by simply marking up the prices so that they could account for those extra costs, doesn't really matter.

Consumers ended up paying this bill. The 650M "refund" was just the government exempting them from costs that the government should not have collected from them in the first place.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And note how prices didn't plummet afterwards. It was a universal price hike on all Americans disguised as regulatory issue.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

They never do.

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 12 points 7 hours ago

"The Democrats caused this by not letting the tariffs go to reducing my income taxes"

-Future Americans

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 17 points 9 hours ago

That's the way it ALWAYS is. Some corporation does something terrible to consumers, and the government fines them a fraction of the profit from the terrible behavior, and then celebrates with a press release about how great they are.

Meanwhile the consumer is still screwed, the corporation still made a profit on their corruption, and the government got their beak wet.

When we take it back, these sorts of corporate fines should be much more onerous (minimum $1 billion per count), including confiscation of entire corporations and entire estates, and the money placed in the "America First Fund" (irony intended), to be the seed money for all the Social program we're going to launch - health care, college/trade school, pre-K, student loan forgiveness, UBI, etc. Use these fines to directly help the people that were hurt by corporate misadventure: the Citizens.

"Fixing America on their dime, while punishing them for their crime" could be the program's slogan.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Spoiler: No

[–] mtpender@piefed.social 15 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure you guy's fought a revolution over this...

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not really, that's just how it's been portrayed over time. The American revolution wasn't led by American workers, it was agitated by the founding American aristocracy who were angry that there was a higher power than them controlling how they made their money. Many of the founding fathers made their fortunes from smuggling operations.

It's not like they abolished taxation or gave broad representation to average Americans. The American revolution was a revolution for the rich by the rich. It's the reason why we have a bicameral Congress, where senators act as overseer over the decisions of the common people. It wasn't until the 17th amendment passed in 1913 that senators actually started to be elected by the people.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 4 hours ago

Yup, and IIRC the colonies did benefit from the taxation. King George built infrastructure and provided soldiers and shit.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Revolution? Nah, that takes effort and I'm not about to do that!! Next you'll be wanting me to protest, or something. Pfffft. Plus we all know protesting is almost impossible in today's age of instant communication...
Anyway. Listen. Listen. The midterms. We'll totally destroy them in the midterms. You'll see. After the midterms they'll all be leaving the country, or be in prison. Just wait for the midterms, bro!!!"

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Yes and, any effort to disenfranchise voters from voting is an effort in favor of the red Republican party who is actively doing gestures tiredly at everything

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Customers pay the tariffs. And then tax payers (customers) pay for the tariff refunds. Which the corporations pocket because it's too difficult to return it to the customers.

[–] Supamanc@sopuli.xyz 7 points 15 hours ago

Don't forget the interest on the debt acquired to make the repayment!

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Difficult for cash sales maybe. Anything paid with a credit card should be dead easy.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think Cards against humanity are giving people their tariff back.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

If I go to Walmart and pay by credit card, well in the old days they didn't track what the individual bought, just the total. And they probably don't want to admit it if they do. Online like Amazon keeps track.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 44 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Americans are not going to do anything about it lol.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Say that after the Midterms.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I hope the rigging attempts won't be successful

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's extremely hard to rig a Midterm, too many tiny Congressional races. All you can do is manipulate them through gerrymandering and propaganda and hope for the best. It will help them a little bit this time, but they are going to be so overwhelmed by Dem votes that seats will flip that people didn't think were even in contention.

[–] bluefootedbooby@sopuli.xyz 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What, are they supposed to NOT use Amazon, for starters? Are you actually insane? That's no way to live where they cannot get their labubu delivered on the same day!

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I always said the Americans wont fight back until there are only 30 brands of cereal on the shelf to pick from.

As long as they have their comforts and false sense of superiority, they will grumble but ultimately accept their authoritarian regime.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That's true for pretty much every society that's fallen to fascism. People often don't start rocking the boat to the extent where it affects change until food scarcity starts.

It's one of the components of humanity's Great Filter, IMO. The other being the sociopaths that take advantage of the complacency.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

This headline is well over a year old.

[–] PotatoPie@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Tried so many times to argue why revolution and resistance is right choice here but i've given up by now, it's hard to feel angry or sad at this theft when it's just normal

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe 5% of your population understands what you do about this massive wealth transfer.

Trump knows exactly what he is doing because he is being told how to do it.

This will not end until the US economy is destroyed or all workers become neo-serfs.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 4 hours ago

People who think the average American is realizing this have no clue just how uninformed the average person is on the US economic policy.

Shit, people still think that you can lose money from getting a raise due to taxes.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 65 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I feel like in the olden days, when stuff like this happened people would form up into a miltia shaped mob, march down to the rich person's house, and deal with the problem.

[–] Awooooooga@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

That happens today, too. Just not in the US lol

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

They didn't have cameras everywhere back then.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I would do that but I cant afford to get to where the rich people live, it’s days of travel away cuz flying is a no-go for me these days.

In the olden days that was not the case, and money/goods couldn't travel that far either. You could torch the owner's house cuz it was in town. You knew where they lived. It was accessible.

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's the best part: Global warming will eventually ix-nay the whole flying thing, and then the wealthy will have to outrun the poors.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

That's why they have bunkers in NZ. I just hope it becomes apparent to their security teams that they do not contribute anything of value-- Assuming it happens before their fantasy of autonomous security.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 31 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Oh and they are keeping the prices at the same rate as when they were paying tariffs!

Burn them all at the stake.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

Prices never go down once they are up.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

Considering he keeps "ending" the war on Iran to play with oil prices while he buys low sells high; makes me think the price gouging followed by tariff refunds was the real goal all along.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Tariffs are just a roundabout way to implement flat tax. That's why they talk about how tariff income will replace lost tax revenue.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 4 hours ago

And in this instance, they're being used because the SC said that Trump can't impose a broad import tax.

So he conveniently enacts tariffs on our trading partners, who make up 99.4% of our imports, because they "didn't do enough to ensure slave labor wasn't used."

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Ding ding. We have a winner.

[–] ShutUpWesley@piefed.zip 7 points 14 hours ago

In case your unaware, that was the plan the whole time.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It only takes 30% of Americans in the right states to feel that way and the entire federal government is theirs.

The slave states lost the big armed showdown, but won the war

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago

The War isn't over yet.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

I think the math works out that you only need 23% of the total vote to win an election? Number from a mostly remembered YouTube video a decade ago.

Assuming 50% plus 1 in the 40 least populated states and no votes at all in the 10 most populated states.

load more comments
view more: next ›