this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
293 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

87302 readers
3548 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
293
SEC bought access to over a billion airline records to track travelers, no warrant required (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 week ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why the hell is the SEC doing this?

Guess I’ll read the whole article to find out.

The report is especially surprising because the SEC is a civil financial regulator tasked with investigating insider trading, securities fraud, and market manipulation. It's not an intelligence or counterterrorism agency

So…?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

So:

Critics say buying commercially available records allows government agencies to bypass safeguards that could require a warrant or court order if the information were demanded directly.

The SEC is controlled by regime flunkies now. This is an end-run of the 4th amendment.

ARC announced last November that it was shutting down TIP following pressure from lawmakers and reports about its government contracts. The program ended in 2025, but the newly released SEC documents reveal that its reach was far wider than previously known, and that overseas travelers were included in the system.

In related news, it was reported in March that FBI Director Kash Patel defended the bureau's continued purchase of Americans' location data, despite warnings from lawmakers that the practice sidesteps Fourth Amendment protections.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How is this not unlawful search?

I understand that because the use of and purchase/sharing of this kind of data (which for the purposes of my arguments includes any data broker data, including the data from Flock license plate readers) is not considered illegal due to a lack of consumer protection laws. But how is the government acquiring and using this data not considered a subversion of due process?

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

They don't care, law doesn't really matter anymore

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They count as business records. No need for a warrant.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 1 week ago

Because the majority of the SC are traitors.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does anyone really have expectations of privacy when then buy a ticket and then fly in a plane full of people to a different city, stat or country?

[–] Monument@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes. I expect privacy like I have a right to it.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“The records contained passengers' names, credit card numbers used to buy tickets, departure and arrival cities, flight dates and numbers, and the agency responsible for the sale.“

And it includes flights that are totally outside the US.

A good reason to not use your primary credit card as who knows who has access to this data. A debit card linked to a burner savings account is probably best.

[–] Techranger@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Aren't banks subject to KYC rules? At least, in the US?

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

My worry is card theft. Using a a card with a low limit or a debit card on an account that doesn’t have much money in it seems the way to limit exposure. All the accounts are legitimate in your own name.

The whole idea that your data can be sold by a middleman or anyone also seems on the nose but that’s the way it is.