The first line of a CNN article cycling themselves is so fucking true.
Is either this or the article cite another article that the primary source is another article 100% copying some fever dream from Adrian Zenz.
Libs of this world if an article cites a propaganda as source that means the article is propaganda.
Fighting terrorism is supposed to be about blowing up brown people in foreign countries. De-radicalization, supporting indigenous cultures and effective economic development are the real GeNoCiDe!!! Don't you see that China is the WoRsT aUtHoRiTaRiAn!?!?!
worth noting these terrorists were manufactured and radicalized by the cia. this is a fabricated event but china instead of blowing up afghanistan to death solved it like a civilized nation.
No but thats impossible CNN TheGuardian and Reuters would never cite a non credible source that says Hamas beheaded 40 babies
and wikipedia too!!! don't forget about wikipedia!
sure, grade school children can't use it as a source because it's so false, but that doesn't mean that we can't use it for international politics! lol
Don't forget to call anyone that contradicts this TOTALLY REAL GENOCIDE(it is known) a "russian propagandist bot" and then of course some homophobia related to Putin or Xi!
privet tovarish ))
Last week the Trump admin added a bunch of companies to the list of those accused of using forced Uyghur labor.
Sure enough all week there's been renewed talk about Xinjiang. They're trying to get ahead of the midterms, and they got nothing else.
