this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12332 readers
620 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I fucking hate Doug Ford for the destruction he’s done to this province.

All you need to know about the kind of man he is: He thinks Ronald Regan was the best U.S. president ever. Enough said. He sucks.

Ford is a disgrace to Ontario and Canada and I for one cannot wait for him to join crackhead Rob and the rest of his dead degenerate family deep in the ground.

If there’s a hell, I hope he burns in it.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Ford may pretend to dislike Trump publicly but everything he does lines up with that fucker. They're all cut from the same disgusting cloth. Has anyone checked his hard drive recently?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

put blame where it belongs, this idiot province either doesn't vote or leaves the trailer park that day to vote for Doug. We were warned.

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Having read the initial ruling, I thought it was a relatively weak argument and the risk of reversal on appeal was moderately high. I'm not surprised at this.

I think the bigger issue here is the Ford government's consistent centralization of municipal power. It's honestly really scary. I'm pissed that Ontarians elected him for another term after the Science Centre debacle.

And obligatory: "jUsT oNe MoRe LaNe BrO!"

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ya, I agree it was kinda weak, but it didn't seem impossible. I was kind of hoping if it was upheld that it might ultimately lead to easier times putting new bike lanes in as well.

[–] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The judges are hiding behind a bunch of legalese, out of cowardice. Everyone agrees that is an idiot Ford waging a dumb culture war, and putting lives at risk. At least the first judge called it the way it is, and had some guts.

If judges don't stand up to stupid people, a major and fundamental aspect of democracy is gone.

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree with you on outcome, but not on method, and there's a principle behind it.

Judges need to remain fair and judge the law fairly. Unfortunately in this case, that comes with a stupid outcome driven by stupid people. But it was the right outcome based on our system of laws. I think this battle is lost, but that doesn't mean give up on the war. The goal should have always been: change the laws so cities can make their own decisions about bike lanes (or something like that, I'm not claiming to have the ultimate goal here).

We should take down Ford based on the battles that are beyond equivocation:

  • Billions in unspent federal funding for healthcare
  • The closed Science Centre: An Ontarian icon
  • The grift for real estate developers
  • Centralization of municipal powers
  • etc.

We wrote a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, those words are real, the judge just dismissed it. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a useless piece of paper because these judges did not stand up for it.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The lower judges get some leeway on making rulings like that and the ability to call people out, because it will go to the appeal court, and possibly the supreme court, but ultimately it has to come down to the actual law as egerlach's reply says. You can't just outlaw someone doing something stupid because it's bad idea and a waste of money without the law saying you can.

Its our job to stand up to people doing stupid but legal shit and not re-elect them, or recall them when possible.

This might still be appealed as well, I didn't see them say they wouldn't.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder if they'll appeal, but given the ruling, I'm not sure how well that would go.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Judges are being bribed by big oil and Doug.