this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
1217 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

88062 readers
3493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 118 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I love graphene, but I hope they're planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene's long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users' standards.

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 156 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah by "switch to" they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that's a later phase.

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 29 points 3 weeks ago

I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones

They do. They say it in their roadmap:

Hardware and firmware security are core parts of the project, but it's currently limited to research and submitting suggestions and bug reports upstream. In the long term, the project will need to move into the hardware space.

https://grapheneos.org/faq#roadmap

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would you trust a pre-flashed phone though?

I guess with GOS they have integrity checkers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are some third party vendors online that ship pre-flashed GrapheneOS phones iirc, but I don't believe there has ever been on with it factory installed.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would never trust a pre flashed Graphene phone. Always flash yourself for security.

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago

I agree, you should always flash it yourself. Though GrapheneOS does have the Auditor app to attest the integrity of the operating system against another GrapheneOS device. It's always going to be best practice to do it yourself, however.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There are some really talented people working on the camera systems for Apple and Google etc. what I don’t get is surely there are some equally talented engineers (in image processing) who love open source so why aren’t they working on an open source camera platform?

It seems an itch that’s not getting scratched.

[–] ernest314@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

idk if this is the case here but on a firmware level, interfacing with these camera chips almost always requires an NDA that they'll only sign with very large minimum orders

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

This is also why open source wearables can't have the best PPG heart rate/SPO2 tracking.

There are only about 4 PPG analog front ends still in production that don't require an NDA and the Max86141 is the only one worth anything it seems.

You can't do analog front ends with any small FPGAs that I know of and it is simply to large to do it (well, at least) on a small wearable with discrete components.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 94 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

They need to support it on the Moto G phones so people can actually afford them.

[–] pjusk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

iirc, as of right now, its only the expensive processors that meet the security standards GrapheneOS has. Therefore only being available in the future high-end Motorola phones.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup its exactly this. And with supply shortages, itll take a while to filter down in price unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. Graphene is not for the poors, still. Even used phones that can run it can be pricey.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

What are the odds that it filters down?

I'll pick up a cheap android and put Lineage on it before I buy another flagship phone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 74 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

I'm still looking for a solution after https://keepandroidopen.org/

About 50% of my apps are from F-Droid (the others are specific local apps and especially bank apps, which is difficult ...)

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 53 points 3 weeks ago

I'll believe it when the roms hit xda.

Excited, sure, just hesitant. No buy until it's truth.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 51 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

whistles

They make a $2,600 smartphone?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd bet that about half the price is just the RAM soldered onto the thing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Please Moto, make a not gigantic 6in slab of a phone. Please make one ~5in with good specs.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't care that much about size. Not nearly as much as the "flagship" designation bullshit. How about we don't have to pay 5x as much, because it's a flagship and still let us have Graphene?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] holy_scroller@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yep. Sick of giant phones. Crazy hard to find a small phone with decent specs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

personally i think Moto G Power is gonna be a beast with GOS

Dual sim slots sd card headphone jack insane battery

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

AFAIK they're only targeting their flagship models first. Guess we'll see, but I don't think the Moto G series will get it. At least not initially.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay good, they clarified that they won’t ship with it. I’ve seen people saying they will but I never read anything from Graphene or Moto stating that.

[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 31 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Wouldn't it be better if it DID? Wouldn't that get around all the "tamper" detection stuff?

Right now I have Google Play disabled in my owner profile, but it would be nice if apps in secondary profiles could pass the full Play Integrity checks... even though I'm actively trying to transition away from them.

For example Cisco DUO says my device with GrapheneOS installed has been tampered with, and I was hoping that would go away if I could just buy the phone with GrapheneOS installed.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

In the long term, yes it would be better if it shipped.

However, if someone went to a phone store with a stock graphene on display and anything else next to it, which one do you think they'll choose?

Until Graphene's stock experience (i.e stock apps and launcher) mature enough to not look out of place next to google and apple, the average Joe will pick the more polished phone. I hope improving that is a task Motorola will be able to help with, while graphene keeps doing their thing.

Additionally with the app/play store dualopoly, Motorola would be shooting them selves in the foot if they didn't ship with the play store.

Getting an option beside a pixel for Grapheneos is pretty cool and a big step forward. I hope new demand will be high enough to show the decision makers that its an endeavor worth continuing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Man, I would be all over the is of it was on lower end models so I can run graphene as my sketchy international travel phone. But I don't really want to pay flagship prices for that. And I still believe in having a curated primary digital fingerprint.

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And I still believe in having a curated primary digital fingerprint.

Could you please elaborate? I know what digital footprint is, minimizing and compartmentalization techniques, but not primary and curated digital footprint.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Functional and hypothetical only example usage of a curated digital footprint, for story purposes:

You keep, use, maintain, and preferably daily drive technology interfacing gizmos in a manner that results in a footprint where the conclusions drawn from it resolve to a "curated" set of... whatever the beholder is looking to ID from the footprint.

Functional example:

You keep and use devices in a manner that is at most "normie+".

You own a Pixel Phone but keep stock android on it and add just enough to it not make you hate your life. You use a couple of normal sub services.

You still show some of your silly, like use an account on a porn website that federates with the world you care to socialize with. You still post how The Man better watch out.

Same as everyone else. The fingerprint looks like what you want it to look like.

So that it remains separate from what could happen/be happening elsewhere inside a Faraday cage with other devices there. How they are configured like, or who they talk to, the networks you utilize and the level of silly you display in your other accounts that have never so much as shared a trace route in passing together.

That's hypothetically separate from the curated digital identity, depending on how careful and good at it your set up was.

So when the friendly folks with the mass surveillance pull up your file, it's composed of what you wanted there to begin with.

It's just another implementation layer of minimizing and compartmentalization, really.

Hypothetically. For a friend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Having no footprint is as obvious as having a unique one. It's easier to hide in the crowd.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 weeks ago
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

I 100% understand and support why the moved away from google.

And Motorola was a good choice. But they really should have supported some budget phones.

A pixel series a could easily be found for under 500€ new. These flagship motorola phones are all way over 1000€.

And the developer clearly said they had currently no intention to support cheaper motorola phones. Among other things because Motorola won't offer 7 year updates for anything but these flagships.

So, I get it. But let's face it that people on a budget will keep using pixels for GOS while they are maintained.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago

I just got a pixel 9 refurbished for 350CAD and, a part from the irony of needing a phone made by google to have a degoogled phone, Graphene is a great OS. It just does what any basic phone os should do, and that's make it gold in the current dystopia.

[–] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What will US do if lenevo is Chinese and owns Motorola and now the US doesn't have backdoors like they do on Apple and Google devices.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago

This is great and all, gives more device options for GOS. However, being only flagship, this will put GOS out of reach for alot of people due to the cost of flagship phones and the current economy. Especially if Google starts making future Pixels unable to have GOS flashed onto them.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How about 6 camera lenses, so it doesn't wobble?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm waiting for the "whoops!! All Lenses!" Version

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

The onion needs to do for phone cameras what it did for Gilette razors:

https://theonion.com/fuck-everything-were-doing-five-blades-1819584036/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›