this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
473 points (98.8% liked)

Greentext

8746 readers
492 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 186 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's a shitty question though. Totally irrelevant to the meat of the story, and definitely not a proof someone read the whole thing and thought about it.

[–] RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz 125 points 1 week ago

Welcome to the school system

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Questions like that are good to know if somebody read the thing. You don't get details in resumes.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it isn't.

Most people will not retain the name of an animal that doesn't speak. The horse has zero impact on the story, and only serves as a piece of Quixote' personality signifiers

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would say Rocinante helps early in the story, with understanding the depth of Quixote's delusion.

Whilst in reality Rocinante is an old workhorse; in the delusion of Don Quixote, Rocinante is a grand charger fit for a knight of the highest order.

Helping to illustrate the core of the story; Don Quixote is applying a veneer of importance and significance over the top of reality. Rocinante is a reflection of the Don himself.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I agree with the role Rocinante plays for sure.

I just don't think that makes the name of the horse a good question. It's like asking the name of John Wick's dog. The whole movie hinges on the dog, but what name it has is irrelevant.

The point of reading something like Don Quixote isn't the names. Even Pancho's name is barely important. Hell, I'd even argue that the fact we're talking about Don Quixote rather than Alonso Quixano even illustrates that names aren't exactly the prime bit of information that matters.

Now, it is hard to discuss the story without factoring in name changes. Aldonza/Dulcinea in specific is maybe the biggest symbol of what the Don is experiencing, and the underlying theme of the story. But the specific names? It's just a bad question for a high school English teacher to ask a student.

My reasoning is that, no matter what else is retained, names only serve as a point of reference in damn near all literature. When an early exposure to old school, classical literature is happening, the student is going to already be learning three or four things at once, and memorizing the name of a non dialogue character doesn't serve do achieve that learning, or even test how much that student retained.

You've got them trying to learn how to read critically, how to read archaic styles, how to retain important factors, and how to express what they've picked up. The name of an animal that's essentially stage dressing akin to the sword or armor? That's entirely the wrong question.

What would be a good one is, "what does Quixote's horse symbolize?" Or even, "what do you think about his horse?". Both would get the student thinking rather than trying to just pull up a word that's arbitrary.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 week ago

What would be a good one is, “what does Quixote’s horse symbolize?” Or even, “what do you think about his horse?”. Both would get the student thinking rather than trying to just pull up a word that’s arbitrary.

That is a great point.

Significantly better questions; than a name.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 110 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Rocinante and the only reason I know is because of The Expanse.

[–] TheDarkestShark@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One of my favorite fan theories is that the authors did not name the ship after the horse from don quixote directly. There is a Rush song called Cygnus X-1 that's basically a space opera and the ship in that song is called the Rocinate, and one of the authors of The Expanse is a huge rush fan. So in my mind that is where the ships name comes from.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I also learned it from Rush, hell yeah!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sanzky@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I love that the guys say something like "it means war horse". Rocinante is a word play with "Rocin antes". Rocin being an old weak horse unfit for serious work and. 'antes' is the spanish word for 'before'.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 95 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I only know this because of The Expanse.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] J92@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I only know the name of the ship from Moby Dick from MGS V.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's one badass horse right there

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It's pronounced legitimate salvage

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

only remember the name because of The Expanse

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (10 children)

But if you pronounce it like the show, every Spanish speaker has the right to whoop your ass just once

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

when i moved to austin and everyone was pronouncing guadalupe "guadaloop" and looking at me funny for pronouncing it guadalupe, i got murder eyes for like a month.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sober_monk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

laughs in Baaathelona

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Same experience with a really old German book. He wanted to know the color of the hat one of the side characters was wearing. I had no clue, after investing so much time into trying to understand it. That kinda made me give up - why try to participate when the outcome is the same as if I didn't?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I read the book about a year ago and I recently I was trying to remember the name of the horse for some reason. I also completely blanked on it, and it took me a few minutes.

I'm pretty terrible at remembering details like that. My brain just stores things relatively, like 'the main character's brother', even after reading his name a hundred times.

Anon should have just told his teacher that the horse (rocinante) is nothing compared to Sancho's she-ass.

[–] frog@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I never remember the author's name. I have consistently gotten it wrong in nearly every quiz. Lol

[–] hawgietonight@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Everyone knows him as Cervantes, even though his full name is Miguel de Cervantes. I live in Castilla-La Mancha and everywhere is Quijote.. I even know a lady called Dulcinea.. not a common name btw.

Edit. Just read this and sorry might have come across overly pedantic. I just got up and my brain is still toast.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 7 points 1 week ago

i remember it because of soulcalibur

[–] Boozilla@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Feel this in my bones. I enjoy reading books, but they go down the memory hole fast for me, especially names.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a strong case of the "My eyes were moving correctly but i was thinking about lunch for the last 3 paragraphs"es

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 23 points 1 week ago

Anon should be disappointed in their teacher, honestly.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For me, the problem with "Rocinante" is I don't know how to pronounce it. So, while reading, I'd skip past it, recognizing that it's the horse, but not parsing it as a word.

If asked that question, I'd need to explain that, but I'd stumble over the word.

If a book has too many oddly (to me) spelled names, I'll skip it for this reason. Apostrophes in the middle and no vowels, and I'm not going to read your book.

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Ro Cin An Te

Roh sin ahn the

Rocinante

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Why would you make it a 'th' at the end??

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

Autocorrect is a motherfucker

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The names of the 3 musketeers regularly come up in crosswords and no matter how many times I see it I can't remember one of the 4. There's Porthos, Athos, and I believe D'Artagnan was the one who joined later. Doesn't help that their names sound vaguely like the 3 fates: Atropos, Clotho, and Lachesis.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aramis is the one you’re missing, and he’s also the one I always forget. I can remember porthos and athos because they sound similar, and d’artagnan was the name of the company my old job used for some supplies, but Aramis is too easy a name to forget.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sumsinj@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tbh I don't remember more than 2 character names per story. If a chapter contains more than two actors then I am totally confused who those persons were and their relationships and such...

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why I greatly appreciated how in This Is How You Lose the Time War, there are only two characters that matter and their names are Red and Blue

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Have fun with "War and Peace". Sooo many characters and everyone is some kind of Count or Lord with partly similar family names. Many of them also have a Russian and a French name and switch between them depending on context. I listened to the whole thing as audiobook and it basically took me the whole first book (of 4) to get a vague understanding of the characters. Listening helped a little bit because the reader had a slightly different intonation depending on which character was speaking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Wasn't it a donkey? I think it was named Rocinante? Idk, I read it like 16 years ago.

Edit post-Wikipedia: it was a workhorse, not a donkey, but I nailed the name. I've wondered in the past if Geralt's horse Roach in The Witcher was a nod to Rocinante

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Are we supposed to say "ask me a harder question" in this situation?

[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

horsey mchorseyton

[–] FluidBeef@quokk.au 8 points 1 week ago

Horsey McHorseface

load more comments
view more: next ›