this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
860 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87949 readers
3156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51634640

A new Gamers Nexus investigation found a retail LG TV actively scanning the local network for phones, laptops, smartwatches and other connected devices, while also capturing microphone audio when the screen appeared to be in standby. The investigation found voice data being stored locally even after the TV was disconnected from the network, with the queued data uploaded once connectivity returned. Researchers also uncovered webOS vulnerabilities that could potentially turn the television into a remotely controlled surveillance device. The really unsettling part isn't just the advertising angle. It's the fact that a consumer television can sit inside your trusted network, enumerate other devices, access a microphone, store collected data locally and communicate with external infrastructure. Put that same device in a corporate office, hospital, hotel or conference room and the security implications become considerably more serious. I went through the investigation in detail, including the network scanning, microphone behavior, ACR, webOS attack surface, offline data collection and practical mitigations

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

anybody know when this started? i don't have my tv connected to the network, and have not updated the firmware in 2 r 3 years.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Remember: all that is done simply to give LG executives, like, a few dozen bucks over the device's lifetime.

Customer privacy means nothing at all to them. They sell it for pocket change.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 81 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"We own the glass, we own the TV, we own the living room. We know who is in an LG home." --LG President of Ads

These are the Gamers Nexus videos these articles are referencing btw. Support them and their work. Get some cool shirts and physical media while you're at it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5KnFmKjFTA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 150 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Don't connect TVs to your network.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 91 points 3 days ago (17 children)

And according to the article the data collection runs even if it's disconnected. So, don't ever connect it to the network. As soon as you do everything gets uploaded.

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Could I burn a hole through a WiFi chip with a soldering iron?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (8 children)

This would've worked just a few years back but due to shitty "age verification" laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up. They may also implement an always-online model and they'll justify that it's necessary to monitor users for "age verification purposes". ATP better to get a good monitor and use it as TV cuz cable or satellite boxes are either way gonna be provided by the network companies so that's there

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's hard to find a dumb TV.
Monitors and projectors are going the same way. Not connecting them might not be enough.

Time to learn how to use a soldering iron.

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

modern ones are soldered directly to the board and integrate bluetooth into the same chip and removing that chip form the board could remove the ability to use bluetooth functions and the remote, however!!!!!!! most have usb ports!!!!!! lets make new operating systems and fucking delete their file system, load a new os that lacks the abilities these manufactures have.

The hardware is whatever but if we remove the file systems that its preloaded with it won't be able to load any of its preinstalled shit. If we mod the operating system we can mod some of the shit the hardware is capable of doing through the software and coding. Kinda like how windows 11 is known for lowering ram speed.

load more comments (3 replies)

It is like trying to find a new car that doesn't have one of those fucking screens instead of a real console.

[–] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

I keep my tv dumb by not connecting it to a network.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

... Well great, now I have to check whether my television has a goddamn microphone for some reason. I didn't think to check because it's a television.

Never connected it to the Wifi though.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Doesn't anything with a speaker have an inherent shitty microphone?

Does it have voice command capability?

[–] abc@suppo.fi 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is why TVs cost close to nothing these days. If you're not the customer, you're the product.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 67 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Really makes one wonder...How many fucking data points do these assholes need telling them we're too fucking broke for their game and want their heads on pikes?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 36 points 2 days ago

Fuck LG, this is creepy AF

[–] paulcdb@lemmy.radio 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don’t care that companies thought they’d get away with this, the problem is have are the people buying this shit! This should’ve been enough to get people to just refuse to buy it but no.

And the bigger problem isn’t what we know they can do, you have to think about what it ‘could’ do.

Even if you never connect this stuff to the internet, they could still track all this stuff locally. Once that happens, which no doubt it will if not already, what happens if suddenly you get arrested for something, they confiscate the TV, download all the stuff tracked, and oops, something even more incriminating… maybe you watched an illiegal movie on jellyfin! 😲

Look at all the “People will never let it happen” that has happened pretty much unchallenged… you’ll have no privacy, and you’ll all be paying for it!

[–] nserrano@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The majority of people do not realize how much information is being recorded and what it’s used for. If there was an easy way to track down how a telemarketer got your information, a lot more people would freak out and demand change.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dontfeedthemouse@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem is not that people are buying this willingly, it's because they don't know. If you present them two rougly similar options, but one of them is a spying machine, people will choose the other one. This stuff should not be legal in the first place.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem's that what's presented is a cheap machine vs an expensive machine. Guess which one spies on you?

[–] AbKingPro@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

That's not true at all. The LG OLED (C5, G5) are very expensive. I paid over 1300$ for my C4 last year and just learned that LG is pulling this shit.

[–] dontfeedthemouse@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's true, but the law should be the first line of defence against practices like this - you can't expect every person to do thorough research on every appliance they buy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xabis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What exactly is the alternative? Every tv manufacturer is doing this. Buying a commercial display isn’t the answer.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Scepter.

(I dunno if they're doing it yet or not but I bought a dumb TV and a dumb monitor from them and I really hope they stay dumb)

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Probably safe to assume every other smart TV brand is doing the same, but just no one has gone to the effort to check...

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It’s not just LG. It’s all of them.

And, the cheaper the TV, the more often and intrusive these settings are.

It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (8 children)

It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

Consumer projectors come with the same "smart" shit as TVs these days. Just don't connect either to WiFi. Problem solved.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 38 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I was at my parent’s house, trying to add some items to the smart TV. They started listening to these awful AI interpersonal dramas read by AI, on YouTube.

My thought was to add some podcasts and their Audible account, for more selections. Maybe they’ll still only listen to that, even so. You can’t add much to a smart tv. No podcasts. No podcast app. A pretty spartan selection of apps. Even something as large and mainstream as Audible. No go. Libby? Yeah, right.

I don’t get it. What’s the point? Just buy a monitor, jack it into a PC for media, and have everything you want minus this telemetry.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago

There's no "might" here. It's why high-end TVs are cheap.

[–] bloviate@lemmus.org 4 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Is there a way to direct all the iffy traffic from the tv to a pi hole?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cottonbk@szmer.info 2 points 2 days ago

I wonder if I can disable it if I rooted webOS on my parents' TV

load more comments
view more: next ›