this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
64 points (93.2% liked)

politics

31051 readers
2375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One year after Charlie Kirk's death, the organization is a joke — even on the right

When Charlie Kirk was alive, his wife Erika had a retrograde role that was easy to understand. She didn’t use the word, but she was a tradwife.

Her position at Turning Point USA, the organization her husband co-founded in 2012 to promote conservative politics on high school, college and university campuses across the country, was essentially to dote on him as her leader.

After they married in 2021, she became the evidence that Charlie Kirk was living up to his own beliefs about male leadership — and female submission — at home during the crucial period that he was rebranding himself as an evangelical leader from the secular libertarian he had been.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 86 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because she's a woman in an inherently misogynistic movement?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 44 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I was gunna say it was a lack of funeral pyrotechnics, but misogynists on the far right makes sense too.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Every MAGA woman discovers this at some point. And they always act surprised.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 55 minutes ago

But they never thought the leopards would eat their face!

[–] subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This article is disingenuous to say the least. Kirk's death was met with bipartisan celebration, not horror. The left of course because he was a fascist who died in the most ironical manner possible. On the right cause they now had a martyr. The only people horrified were those who bought into his performance of debate.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Plus he was fresh in a lot of peoples minds as South Park aired an episode targeted at him and Cartman doing his "master debater" shtick less than a month before it happened.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 37 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

She immediately went on a colossal spending spree to celebrate her new found riches, effectively dancing on his grave.

But hey, could you blame her? Imagine having to be the honeypot wife of Charlie Kirk and bearing his children, let alone ever having sex with him 🤮. You'd be over the moon too when his neck exploded.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure the media should be encouraging people to give her a shot. Especially after she stuck her neck out for an inherently misogynistic organization.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I don't mind her sticking her neck out.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 6 points 1 hour ago

In that case, let's give her a shot.

[–] RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Ehhh,

Eehhhhh

I see what you did there.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing she proved incompetent.

Maybe she should start a cooking podcast now. She chose the role of tradwife, so she should lean into it.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 52 minutes ago

I'm guessing she proved incompetent.

Since when has that been a barrier to success for right wing grifters?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

He died a year ago this week, shot to death while speaking at Utah Valley University.

There's been zero investigation...

And stuff like immediately repaving the concrete before law enforcement looked at it as a crime scene, is weird enough we shouldn't just assume he was shot.

Like, they could have treated it as a normal investigation and people would be able to trust it. But after the shit they immediately pulled, there's always going to be a shred of doubt that his microphone had a bomb or something else.

Dude was breaking from Trump on Israel, obviously America's and Israel's current governments arent above assassinating a streamer.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Shut up.

It can't have been a year already!

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

While you take a few next steps, I agree that Kirk was either a direct competitor, or possibly the one taking over after The Don would snuff it, with his manners, intellect and charisma - either way, he was prone to having a few enemies with a complete lack of morals. I think it’s definitely possible someone from his own team did the job.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 50 minutes ago

I mean, the supposed shooter was legitimately further to the right of Kirk...

I'm just pointing out that a lot of inexplicable shit happened immediately after he died.

Is it most likely he was shot by a rifle? Absolutely.

But we don't actually know that's what happened.