this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12402 readers
441 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK confirm their intention to introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures. In this regard, the UK, France and Canada welcome the important action already taken by Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, Norway and Belgium and will bring forward national measures to ban trade in settlement goods.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

If a UN resolution could steal arab land to create the nation state of israel, they can take it the fuck back and return it to Palestine.

Shit, even the bible says it was never their land. Israel was always stolen. Israel was always built on genocide.

[–] DeadEndLink@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

West bank stolen goods account for only 1% of UK trade with "Israel"

[–] abc@suppo.fi 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Does even Gaza/Hamas support a two-state solution right now? What is the status of Hamas anyway, weren't they supposed to be dismantled and replaced with something else?

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sigh

For gods sake, we are way past the point of just sanctioning the settlements. Sanctions like this are known to be ineffective. It is the Israeli regime that needs to be sanctioned. Anything less is performative.

they are actively considering these and other measures

Actively considering ... Should have been decades ago, and it's too little now.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And still, there is one major economy who consistently refuses to do even that bare minimum.