this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
194 points (99.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47524 readers
501 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yaaarh

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You're welcome.

Shadow Library Uptime Monitor (SLUM)

Tracking public availability status for shadow library services

https://open-slum.org/

When libgen went down and I wanted to keep reading the uncle festers guides, I came across this one.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Piracy is a service problem.

I'm not advocating for piracy, but they're doing it to themselves.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 4 points 2 hours ago

Honestly I just want to bitcoin/zelle/venmo/whatever the author a little money for his awesome book and shortcut everything

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago

Cleanest URL ever ↑

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Why we have to sail the high seas.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Makes you wonder what they didn't want you to see. Guess you'll never know now. They probably already removed the juicy bits.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 44 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

i was about to say this is a job for anna's-archive.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I’m not necessarily against the gradual removal of physical media, and that’s not because I’m defending Sony or anything like that. We’ve been downloading games digitally for decades, and physical media has increasingly gone the way of the DVD. That transition itself doesn’t really bother me.

That said, I absolutely agree that what they’re doing here is bullshit, and physical media is objectively more consumer-friendly in a lot of ways. I’m just saying I understand the argument from a different perspective.

Because when it comes to books, I’m exactly the opposite.

I want an actual physical book. Paper pages, a cover, the whole thing. I’ve tried reading digitally, and I just can’t get into it. Something about reading a book on a screen feels completely wrong to me.

So I guess I understand the attachment to physical media more than I initially thought. I just happen to draw the line in a very different place.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 hours ago

Okay, now if you could explain it to my "But no, they're on my Google account" sister, and preferably before she loses interest and starts talking about something else...

[–] rowinxavier@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

This is the central problem with digital ownership. It isn't real. You don't own anything.

If you have a file which contains the book and has no Digital Restrictions Management on it then you own the book in the same way as if you have the physical book.

If you borrow a book from the library you could make a copy by scanning all the pages and then give the original back. Alternatively you could refuse to return it and pay the replacement cost. In either case you actually had the book with full access.

If you "borrow" the book in apps like this you are not getting the whole thing unencumbered, you are getting something more similar to a webcam view of a page turning robot. Yes you can read the text, but you can't make any changes, mark a spot, read it offline, take a photocopy, and so on. Many of these apps block screenshots, and many also block copy and paste.

It is crazy to me that in order to have reasonable access to a book you have no legal option in many cases. I recently bought Azalea Ellis' books and they are all in a plain eBook format or in a plain audio book format. No DRM, no limits. That means I can use the audio book as I want, which in my case means adding it to my AudioBookShelf server. I can cache it to my phone one book at a time or even the whole series in one go. I can play it at whatever speed I like, 2x is my normal, and nobody can stop me. I can listen to it as many times as I like.

If nobody will sell me the book without DRM I don't consider it buying. They are leasing the book, renting access to it, but I never fool myself into thinking I own it. I don't actually own anything on a PS5, nor on Steam. While Steam has not turned evil yet it is always a possibility, so I treat those licences as access rentals and assume they are temporary.

From a moral perspective if you van have it taken away you don't own it, and if you buying isn't owning then piracy isn't theft. Any claims that someone stole from a publisher when the publisher was claiming they were selling the game are bunk. If they actually sold the game, as GOG does, then it would be theft. But if they only sell a licence for access then it isn't selling the game, and it is therefore not theft.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Who knew he had a biography

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 46 points 8 hours ago

There’s always Anna’s Archive or Z Library. Those copies won’t ever go away

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 36 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Super easy way to solve that problem:

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 38 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

That content is not FOR YOUR REGION

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 3 points 3 hours ago

Side note: you know what is fucking wild about bibles? It's an amalgamation of some really, really old shit, and despite that, there are numerous copyrighted versions. King James is not one of them, but there are a lot.

They get around being Public Domain by virtue of being "novel translations", but when you see the differences between them, it seems like largely bullshit.

[–] dimjim@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

That sucks that whatever service you got lost the license, but I appreciate you giving me a new book to read!

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually pretty awesome.

[–] dimjim@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

No kidding, I got halfway through before I had to stop for bed! I love the existential philosophy of it so far, very much reminds me of SOMA.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The other party losing rights shouldn't be allowed to cancel their obligation to OP.

[–] dimjim@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago

No kidding, at least from OPs title they were only borrowing and hadn’t purchased it. If a company did that to me after I bought a book I’d be skipping my merry way to Z-Library and never touching that company again :)

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm gonna guess it's based on whatever service you are using losing distribution rights to it, because the book is available in the US pretty much everywhere.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 8 points 4 hours ago

My local library 😪

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We need to talk about the 10 missing Mickeys.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

They're all dead, nobody cares. It's the central plot of the book.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Is there any chance it's showing as unavailable because they've renamed it to Mickey 17? I'm sure you've checked that, but just in case...

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The book is still Mickey7. The movie they released based on it is Mickey 17.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago

... I had not. But no.