this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
218 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

88203 readers
4108 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhosMansIsThis@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

This does not whip the Llamas ass.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is a whole enshitification process right there. After a few months Deezer will start removing content that you will have access to over the winamp subscription, or winamp will pull an Amazon and insert ads into the paid subscription, call it basic subscription, and ask for more money for premium without ads.

Fuck this, I'm fine with my navidrome.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yo…..ho…..

Edit. Jokes aside I am with you. I still have my mp3s that I ripped from 20+ years ago. The best thing to do is go back to physical media.

[–] moendopi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand the point of this. Strawberry Player exists. Shortwave exists. I miss the old Zune Player. Mais, c'est la vie, non?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's probably just nostalgia, but honestly it never hurts to have more choice.

We have too many companies that keep consolidating and leaving users with little or no alternative for products and or software.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago

You're bringing back everyone's favourite free pirated mp3 player as a subscription service.. why?

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

For real, Winamp had a great run. Stop ruining it.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Winamp will be reborn

No. No, it won't.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 37 points 19 hours ago

as a streaming service... That really sucks the llama's ass.

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Why would I choose it over VLC?

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 hours ago

Because it really whips the llamas ass!

[–] jackintosh@feddit.nl 2 points 11 hours ago

Winamp’s got a certain “je ne sais quoi”, … style? Personality?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 15 hours ago

I just realized it doesn't even need to be reborn to "take on streaming." Y'all with home servers and a big music collection can just start hosting Shoutcasts again and we can use the OG Winamp to stream. :P

[–] nafzib@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Someone already revived Winamp in the best way years ago with Winamp 2.0 in a browser, complete with all the skins they could salvage: https://webamp.org/

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

Underappreciated work. Note that you can drag-n-drop your own music and listen it there!

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Anyone else still use Foobar2000?

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago

Another subscription thing. Sad.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Winamp isn't even good. There are much better media players. Use Strawberry.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Haven't heard of this one yet, they've got downloads for Linux, will have to try it out. Thanks!

[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

VLC? Foobar2000? I liked winamp.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I liked Winamp too. It hasn't aged well. I'm amazed people use VLC for music. I know you can, but there's better software out there.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 3 hours ago

VLC works for everyhing, but it's very ugly and clunky. I use mpv for videos and I haven't really played music on my computer since the AmaroK days.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"To take on streaming"

In a partnership with Deezer, Winamp will be reborn as a completely new player with its own premium subscription service, with Deezer providing the white-label streaming technology and licensed catalog.

So, basically a nostalgic skin for Deezer.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And Deezer is owned by a Russian Oligarch who was personally sanctioned by Ukraine for profiting off of the war.

This is not the Winamp you're looking for.

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Damn I didn’t know that. I picked Deezer because they were the only music streaming service I could find not based in the USA and their Purple Heart logo is cool. Tho might as well go back to Apple Music which I know isn’t good morally either but at least it pairs perfectly with my iPhone

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

If you don't have any morally "good options" then the only correct choice is one of personal conscience.

Anyone who says otherwise with out being a hypocrite is either Amish or living off grid in the Alaskan forest.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

owned by a Russian Oligarch

TIL

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 4 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, pissed me off when another lemming informed me cos I had left Spotify for deezer because Spotify basically joined the evil big tech club.

Only one that doesn't seemed to have evil ownership is qobuz... Which I have now, but I hate it.

I don't hit the high seas myself, but sometimes it sounds like the only sane choice. ☠️

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Last time I heard about a Winamp reboot it was a Bandcamp ripoff with added cryptoslop. While this seems marginally better it's still pretty disappointing.

Deezer seems alright as a streaming service, though, and they're French so there's that.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Wait. Didn’t it already get rebooted?

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 151 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

It's dead already, then. WinAmp's heritage was providing a free audio player. I was looking forward to a refreshed build to test out, but I won't pay for it.

There are a dozen better, free, maintained, and actively developed players out there. This is less than too little, and far too late. Those of us who used winamp back when it was still activly developed will continue to have nostalgia for it, but I bet it will be DOA to most of the target audience.

I've only kept up on news for it because I was hoping it would be reborn true to itself. I have zero interest in it as a subscription model.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Okay, so yes, but do you have an example for linux? For I have checked out loads and not a single one can both do "next song" (only fast forward, facepalm), and random play the playlist/folder (with one doing it by scrambling the playlist itself smh).

I have a fruit named one thats does it but is a pita for everything else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 3 points 21 hours ago
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's not like it already was shitty when version 3 was released

I still remember the hate for the new interface

Version 5 ("it's so good, we skipped v4") was even worse

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

"Know that mp3 player you love? Well what if it was also a really shitty video player?"

Stay in your lane: the media player

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

WinAmp was already reborn as Wacup though?

https://getwacup.com/

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago

These owners are just whatever lawyers have gotten ahold of the WinAMP trademark.

Anybody remember when they attempted to push out the source code for WinAMP on GitHub and failed miserably? Or included NFTs?

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Bring back Sonique!!!!!!

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 77 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The MP3 era’s favorite player returns with a monthly subscription.

The sub-subtitle says enough that you should just look elsewhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 7 points 1 day ago

Loved Winamp. But over the years how many reborn announcements did it have?

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

I have the feeling the new version's tagline will be something along the lines of

"WINAMP, IT REALLY SUCKS THE LLAMA'S CORPORATE COCK!"

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

All I want is a simple, nostalgic media player.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Will be reborn? If they had actually released Winamp under a real open source licence, it would have been reborn years ago! A bit late for it now!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 6 points 1 day ago

kodi has visualisations

sorry winamp

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 15 points 1 day ago

Winamp revived: nostalgia tickled!

Subscription warning! Go fuck yourself!

[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 9 points 1 day ago

Who needs it? Audacious + Winamp skin.

load more comments
view more: next ›