this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024

145 points (98.0% liked)

News

38348 readers

3095 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

145

For First Time in Two Decades, U.S. Buys More From Mexico Than China (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The United States bought more goods from Mexico than China in 2023 for the first time in 20 years, evidence of how much global trade patterns have shifted.

In the depths of the pandemic, as global supply chains buckled and the cost of shipping a container from China soared nearly twentyfold, Marco Villarreal spied an opportunity.

In 2021, Mr. Villarreal resigned as Caterpillar’s director general in Mexico and began nurturing ties with companies looking to shift manufacturing from China to Mexico. He found a client in Hisun, a Chinese producer of all-terrain vehicles, which hired Mr. Villarreal to establish a $152 million manufacturing site in Saltillo, an industrial hub in northern Mexico.

Mr. Villarreal said foreign companies, particularly those seeking to sell within North America, saw Mexico as a viable alternative to China for several reasons, including the simmering trade tensions between the United States and China.

“The stars are aligning for Mexico,” he said.

New data released on Wednesday showed that Mexico outpaced China for the first time in 20 years to become America’s top source of official imports — a significant shift that highlights how increased tensions between Washington and Beijing are altering trade flows.

The United States’ trade deficit with China narrowed significantly last year, with goods imports from the country dropping 20 percent to $427.2 billion, the data shows. American consumers and businesses turned to Mexico, Europe, South Korea, India, Canada and Vietnam for auto parts, shoes, toys and raw materials.

Non-paywall link

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] jsheradin@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Although I'm sure the headline is true, at least with my industry it's a little misleading. All we did over the past few years was cut in Mexico as middle men.

There's no cost effective domestic source of a particular raw material so it's traditionally been purchased from China and turned into a product in the US. With various tariffs and labor costs it's now cheaper to purchase the same raw material from China, turn it into components in Mexico (thus a Mexican product), and then do final assembly in the US. On paper we're importing things from Mexico but the majority of the money still ends up in the same place.

I'm curious if that's the case for other industries.

[–] 2fat4that@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Taking the manufacturing away is the first step in both independence from China and pushing Mexico towards raw materials refinement by reinforcing the trades that depend on them.

If we can manage to starve China of certain manufacturing jobs the skills won’t be passed down and they’ll be back to making the simple, inferior products they’re known for in less than a generation.

[–] whoelectroplateuntil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Many of the companies doing this ARE Chinese and the goal is to effectively launder the production and make what amounts to a Chinese product seem Mexican by offloading some of the component assembly to Mexican facilities. This lets them sidestep US tarriffs that were imposed by Trump. The article addressed this.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Republicans better like this, because more jobs in Mexico means fewer reason to leave!

[–] TubeTalkerX@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Viva Mexico!

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I wonder how this trend will affect fuel use. Seems like a win for the environment.

[–] whoelectroplateuntil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not really because a lot of the raw materials sourcing comes from the globalized marketplace still, so there's still tons of shipping involved. If Mexico produced more raw materials, like fuck, half as much as China, then you might have an argument, but really what's happening is that an extra hop is being added to the manufacturing process, so more fuel is being burned to deliver the same materials to Mexico so they can be assembled the same as before, then shipped to the next stop. Adding a transit hop from China to Mexico -- requires crossing either the Pacific Ocean or the entirety of Eurasia and then the Atlantic -- is inherently less efficient than doing the resource extraction and primary processing in the same country. Also, as the article itself points out, one of the main drivers of this trend is literally Chinese companies trying to evade US tariffs. Not actually a win for the environment.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Ross Perot be absolutely malding