this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2026
12 points (87.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50180 readers
737 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago

This question doesn't really have an answer because the Internet, by itself, doesn't have an amount of data at all. The Internet is a computer network; it transmits data, doesn't store it. Computers connected to it do.

So you are going to need to define exactly what you mean, such as: all data accessible through the Web? Only data accessible to the public on the Web? Also data accessible through other services than the Web, such as emails on servers with no webmail interface?

Even then one problem with the question is that some data is stored more than once, for example this comment of mine will be federated to several fediverse instances, do you count it once per instance? Once per physical copy made during the operation of that instance (such as backups)? You can see that the question suffers from poor definition.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Youtube alone may be into the (low) zettabytes. I don't know if anything else comes close to that, but streaming services full of 4k movies is a lot of data, so maybe. Entire companies exist on AWS. Billions of individual devices are connected, so depending on your definition, all data that exists anywhere may technically be part of the internet (just not easily available).

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Depends where you draw the line on what is the internet but it we would be well past the TB and PB likely into Exobyte territory when you consider data duplication.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surprising there isn't a larger spike in recent years, but I guess even AI slop has trouble competing with human slop.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just wait til AI video catches on.

If we're lucky it will also come with an improvement in video compression. But probably not, and new video codecs typically take 5-10 years to catch on anyway.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As in longer videos, right? Because we've had the shorter ones for years now, just the quality had been lacking. Didn't matter in putting them out there. As Sagan said, not all bits have equal value.

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean in great volume. I know AI video generation exists, but it's not very common compared to text, images, or music.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

Next year. Definitely on the rise.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The data here is old now, but you might find this article interesting to give you an idea of the scale of the Internet. Maybe consider that Google tries to keep a copy of most of the public internet (compressed) and assume that the whole thing would be several times larger. Never mind that there is a lot that’s not covered by Google (paywalls, non-public forums/Facebook posts, etc.) but then also services like the Internet Archive that try to make multiple time-stamped copies of the Internet, although I think they usually don’t save the images/videos.

To be short, terabytes might sound like a lot to an individual, but the Internet is several orders of magnitude larger.

[–] neidu4@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I remember seeing some estimates in terms of total amount of data (In terabytes) available via HTTP in the late 90s, but I think it'd be impossible to get a reliable estimate these days