They ought to have jurisdiction over their land, and anyone who enters it like any other sovereign nation.
The USA should defend its citizens but still submit to rule of law, like we do with other nations we have treaties with…
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
78 points (98.8% liked)
News
23284 readers
3490 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
But it's also within a state and part of a state. The Native Americans want their own rules and laws that the rest of the states law enforcement can't do anything about when on their land. It's why Indians have had casinos when states don't allow them, and why they want non native Americans to show on their land.
They're trying to pick and choose and have things both ways. Making Americans abide by two sets of state laws with different rules and court proceedings and punishments and rights violations isn't an acceptable solution. The Native Americans allow outside people on their land because they want them there. They don't have to allow the public on their land.
This whole dispute gave an example of a discrepancy between tribal law and state law over what you can be arrested for. Stuff would get dicey for a lot of people pretty quickly if a tribe had some unusual laws and punishments on the books that they arrest people for after getting them to show up on their land. It's just too messy to do that way.
like any other sovereign nation
Do those areas really count as sovereign nations?
Of course it's a problem. What is this title garbage?
That's actually what a good headline looks like. It presents what happened without being biased towards one side (in this case the US federal & state government vs tribal government).
How about not using the term Indian in the title in the 21st century. I understand its not as taboo down there as it is up here, but at least use American Indian. Before clicking through to read more I assumed it was about people from India.
Yeah, I'm from Europe and still got confused,
Not saying you're wrong, but -- it turns out that more people with indigenous North American heritage prefer to be called "Indians," followed by "Native Americans," and then "Other." I still think "Native Americans" is the best general term, but even that papers over the vast array of different indigenous nations on the continent.
The groups involved are the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Senate Committee of Indian Affairs. Insofar as I know they still call them Indian reservations as well.
Fully agree that things should change (and in the article they call them Native Americans.) but at present the naming is in line with current conventions.