this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10168 readers
46 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 40 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I see the accounts that post about 60% "here's why Biden is bad" articles, and occasional one-off comments about how Biden / "the Dems" are bad, and pretty much not much else, have arrived on Beehaw.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Of the last 12 articles I've posted, only 3 could be construed as negative towards Biden. If he doesn't want shitty publicity, maybe he should stop doing a genocide.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 45 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

he should stop doing a genocide.

As soon as he's the one actually doing the genocide, instead of merely continuing long-standing US pro-war-crimes-by-our-allies policy (which, I'll agree, is pretty much war criminal on his part and his weak little baby steps towards maybe not doing it anymore sometime in the theoretical future are not nearly enough)... then I'll agree with this statement. As it is, it's a deliberate distortion.

Of the last 12 articles I've posted, only 3 could be construed as negative towards Biden

Not true.

We could quibble about at what point a story about US policy in general counts as a story about Biden; I gave those ones half a point and arrived at 58% of the stories being criticism of Biden with multiple Hunter Biden stories being the red flag. Others might assign the points differently but it bears mentioning that the next three after that were all heavily and explicitly anti-Biden stories (incl. those two laughably slanted ones about Bidenomics.)

Obviously giving Biden grief over his Gaza policy or anything else is completely legitimate; I actually posted the exact same story you did about the State Dept employee angrily resigning, because it's important. But equally obviously, there's a pattern of accounts posting in a very particular way which includes a constant daily drumbeat of more-or-less-subtle anti Biden stories and individual one-off comments like this one without much engagement outside of that, and you're behaving like one of those accounts, and that's worth commenting on. No?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 11 points 5 months ago
[–] juicy@lemmy.today 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You're seriously upset that I'm posting too many articles critical of US foreign policy while the US funds and arms a genocide? The only pattern you'll find in my posts is a focus on Gaza. If you'd like to see other content, post it. Lemmy needs all the content it can get.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you reading my message through some inverted version of those "They Live" sunglasses?

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As someone who appreciates your efforts in threads and is old enough to get this reference, I salute you

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 5 months ago

Haha thanks, call me Rowdy Roddy Piper I guess

[–] WaterLizard@beehaw.org 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The US is literally on the precipice of deciding if they should become an authoritarian, fascist, theocracy in the next election. Project 2025 is literally staring us in the face and a Biden loss for 2024 all but ensures the end of our democracy. Is it good at this so called democracy now? Not exactly, but it is sure better than the alternative with Trump.

Yes, I am absolutely angry and upset about the situation in Gaza. It bothers me, but I also realize the realities of our current election situation. There is too much on the line for reproductive rights, Trans rights, minority rights, and so much more. Project 2025 puts us one step closer to Handmaid's Tale becoming a reality and marginalized individuals being targeted and possibly put to death. Biden and Trump are our options in this sham two party system and yet I realize not voting for Biden is a sure fire way for things to get worse.

So when I and others see a trend of negative post after negative post about Biden, it reads as a social engineering attack to brew apathy to convince people not to vote. This happened in 2016 with Hillary and we were all told not to worry about Trump. Well I loss my own authority over my reproductive freedom, anti-Trans rhetoric rose, and a chunk of our population became convinced BLM was the bad guys. I and others aren't perfectly happy Biden is the Democratic pick, but him winning a avoids Project 2025 and a GOP Fascist takeover.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 7 points 5 months ago

You aren't seeing a social engineering attack. You're seeing the same thing that you'll find on Tik Tok, Instagram, and anywhere else young progressives can be found. People are angry with Biden and for good reason. Sorry, we're not going to shut up about it. We understand that there is a lot at stake in this election. But nothing can justify looking the other way while genocide is being committed.

I truly wish Biden would take your concerns seriously enough to stop alienating a huge portion of his base with his actions.

[–] within_epsilon@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

What's the Democrat's end game with Project 2025? Is it keep voting Democrat or else you get Project 2025? How can we convince the powerful that genocide is bad?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Last I checked, Biden wasn't the PM of the country doing that.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you supply someone with a weapon that you know will be used to kill their spouse, you will be charged with murder.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Unsurprisingly, this isn't true.

There's actually a much more accurate fleshing out of analogy that could be made -- helping a friend in a violent situation, and enabling them to do violent criminal things but still trying to stop them once it came to the point of killing, and what crime you'd get charged with for that -- but that construction would lead in the direction of nuance, so juicy doesn't want that.

[–] juicy@lemmy.today 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

US: Here's a bullet. Please don't use it to kill a child.

Israel: I'll do what I want.

Israel shoots a toddler.

US: Oh, why'd you do that?! Here's another bullet. This time, please only use it for legitimate self-defence.

Israel: That was self-defence.

Israel shoots a baby

Bystander: Stop that!

US: (to bystander) Mind your own business. (to Israel) Here's another bullet. Now please, no more kids.

Israel shoots pregnant mother

...

...

Is that nuanced enough for you?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This analysis, I pretty much exactly agree with. That all makes it notable that under Biden they put sanctions on settlers for the first time in history and didn't veto a security council attempt to reign in Israel for the first time I'm aware of.

Is that enough? No. Does it excuse 5 months of exactly what you're describing, is it any help to someone whose child starved to death while Biden was gradually coming around in his own time, does it guarantee that anything will happen in the future that isn't just more of the same grim neoliberal encouragement and funding for the slaughter of the browns? No, no, and no.

Are those still relevant facts, though? Yes. Are you posting all this out of any good well intentioned concern for the well being of the Palestinians, or with consideration of the fact that Trump explicitly wants to go in and finish the genocide instead of this limp-wristed-too-late opposition Biden is giving? That one, only you can answer.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I appreciate you taking the time/effort to do the fact checking on these accounts (here and in other threads). I try when I can, but my time is limited by 10,000 things vying for it.

FWIW, that account is ~~2~~ 3 weeks old and exists on an instance that has been springing up trolls left and right because it has wide-open registrations.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

Just to play Devil's advocate here... The US takes that approach to guns inside its own borders, expecting that asking nicely is enough to stop people shooting up schools. So it would be kinda hypocritical for the US to hold Israel to different standards. Guns are America's real religion.

[–] autumn@reddthat.com 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tbh i was not aware that Ireland was ever in love with Joe Biden?

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

JFK and Biden both had Irish Catholic ancestry and were afforded favor with at least half of Ireland based on that.

[–] burningmatches@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you thinking of Northern Ireland (part of the UK)? Ireland is more than two-thirds Catholic.

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you mean to reply to me? Thank you for confirming my claim.

[–] burningmatches@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Saying “at least half of Ireland” made it sound like you thought Ireland was divided in its religious affiliations. It would make sense if you were talking about Northern Ireland, which has faced more than a century of bitter sectarian division, but Ireland is solidly Catholic.

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks. I'm not Irish. I knew Ireland was at least half catholic, but now I understand that it is some percentage more, approaching 100%! Cheers! <3

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryBut it also urges restraint in Israel’s response, making multiple interventions at the European Union level and consistently calling for a cease-fire and a political solution to the carnage.

Though St. Patrick’s Day was months away, protesters looked to the annual meeting in Washington between the Irish prime minister, or taoiseach, and the American president.

It was transformed with a slight modification into a mural in Belfast, a city where Palestinian flags have long flown in nationalist communities; was spray-painted along tram tracks in Dublin; and took hold on social media, where people drew black shamrocks on the palms of their hands.

In the press, commentators lined up to pass judgment on the American president, including the acclaimed novelist Sally Rooney, who characterized the assault on Gaza as “Biden’s war.” The criticism, at times, has been intimate.

In County Louth, where Mr. Biden’s great-grandfather James Finnegan was born, a group of people gathered at a graveyard to castigate the president for betraying his roots.

“But then, once in a lifetime/The longed-for tidal wave/Of justice can rise up,/And hope and history rhyme.” As Irish people look across the Atlantic to Ireland’s great-grandson, many are waiting for that rhyme to land.


Saved 83% of original text.