Ashelyn

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How about: Popularizing the idea of the wall in the first place, going mask-off calling illegal immigrants "murderers and rapists", the "Muslim Ban" on air travel, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, employing white nationalists as staffers, packing the supreme court with extreme conservative justices, giving permanent tax cuts to the rich, expanding the presence of immigrant concentration camps, cozying up to foreign dictators, stating he wanted generals like Adolf Hitler's behind closed doors when his own generals refused to nuke North Korea and blame it on someone else, egging on a far-right insurrection attempt, directly pursuing strikes and assassination attempts against middle-Eastern military generals and diplomats, ending the Iran nuclear deal, calling climate change a Chinese hoax, calling Covid the "China virus", spreading vaccine disinformation until one was developed before the end of his term, trying to start a trade war with China, discrediting his chief medical advisor on factual statements about Covid, saying Black Lives Matters were "burning down cities", wanting to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization, declaring "far left radical lunatics" part of his "enemy from within", being an avowed friend of Epstein, sexually assaulting over a dozen women and underage girls, being a generally abusive sleazebag, also funding a genocide (Israel has always been ethnically displacing Palestinians), also building the wall, also not implementing healthcare reform (and being against what we have), also not protecting abortion rights (+ setting up the conditions that led to their erosion; see supreme court point above), and also denigrating anti-genocide protestors (but not as harshly since he wasn't the one in charge when it happened).

I guess he's not a cop though, so there's that.

(minor edits made for grammar/spelling)

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

On the whole, maybe LLMs do make these subjects more accessible in a way that's a net-positive, but there are a lot of monied interests that make positive, transparent design choices unlikely. The companies that create and tweak these generalized models want to make a return in the long run. Consequently, they have deliberately made their products speak in authoritative, neutral tones to make them seem more correct, unbiased and trustworthy to people.

The problem is that LLMs 'hallucinate' details as an unavoidable consequence of their design. People can tell untruths as well, but if a person lies or misspeaks about a scientific study, they can be called out on it. An LLM cannot be held accountable in the same way, as it's essentially a complex statistical prediction algorithm. Non-savvy users can easily be fed misinfo straight from the tap, and bad actors can easily generate correct-sounding misinformation to deliberately try and sway others.

ChatGPT completely fabricating authors, titles, and even (fake) links to studies is a known problem. Far too often, unsuspecting users take its output at face value and believe it to be correct because it sounds correct. This is bad, and part of the issue is marketing these models as though they're intelligent. They're very good at generating plausible responses, but this should never be construed as them being good at generating correct ones.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

Wow, it's almost as if someone being bad can be for multiple reasons!

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

Ideally, I agree wholeheartedly. American gun culture multiplies the damage of every other issue we have by a lot

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

One or more parents in denial that there's anything wrong with their kids and/or the idea they need to take gun storage seriously? That's the first thing that comes to mind, and it's not uncommon in the US. Especially when you consider that a lot of gun rhetoric revolves around self defense in an emergency/home invasion, not having at least one gun readily available defeats the main purpose in their minds.

edit: meant to respond to django@discuss.tchncs.de

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

90 days to cycle private tokens/keys?

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 weeks ago

Damn that website is probably the most frustrating mobile experience I've had. Demands you use the app, automatically and quickly redirects you to an app store page, then the app store page automatically tries to open in the store application

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago

It's the title of an article?

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In dry climates, the water actually will dry itself relatively quickly as long as there's not an overwhelming amount. In more humid areas though, yup.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

I've heard there are hyper-reflective stickers you can put on/near the plate that basically blind a traffic camera's view when trying to read it

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cyberpunk is considered a sub genre of sci-fi because a bunch of people got together and said that's what it is. Doesn't make it a 100% hard set rule. You just like putting things in boxes. A piece of creative work is what it contains, not whatever categories you shove it into.

I accept that the intersubjective framework of literary genres exists, but have my disagreements with it. You can do that. It doesn't make you wrong, just unpopular.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Advertising is like the Kudzu vine: neat and potentially useful if maintained responsibly, but beyond capable of growing out of control and strangling the very landscape if you don't constantly keep it in check. I think, for instance, that a podcast or over-the-air show running an ad-read with an affiliate link is fine for the most part, as long as it's relatively unobtrusive and doesn't put limitations on what the content would otherwise go over.

The problem is that there needs to be a reset of advertiser expectations. Right now, they expect the return on investment that comes from hyper-specific and invasive data, and I don't think you can get that same level of effectiveness without it. The current advertising model is entrenched, and the parasitic roots have eroded the foundation. Those roots will always be parasitic because that's the nature of advertising, and the profit motive in general when unchecked.

view more: ‹ prev next ›