Blaze

joined 7 months ago
[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Nice community

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@Mr_Mofu@lemmy.blahaj.zone for their contributions to several communities

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

I found my latest job there. Some companies tend to mostly post in LinkedIn rather than other job boards. I guess it's probably country dependent

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

Interesting, thanks!

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 months ago

There's a tldw in the OP

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago

Indeed, but the issue is when one third of the population is there

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Agree with your first paragraph.

If !databreaches@lemmy.zip became the reference community, then it’s subject to all the federation/defederation of lemmy.zip, rules of lemmy.zip and laws of lemmy.zip host server and applying it to the whole Fediverse.

Indeed. I found Lemmy.zip governance to be very transparent and responsible, so I wouldn't mind.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

I'm probably just going to see the Phantom Menace (that's the only one they have in my city).

Would be nice to watch Duel of the Fates again

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago (8 children)

I wouldn't say they are the opposite, they are still federated with a lots of instance, just not LW and SJW.

About the grouping of communities, that would be an improvement, but at the same time, wouldn't that be strange for new joiners to have to group a few communities on the same topic while they only want to follow it?

I know it's a balance between centralization and decentralization, but sometimes I feel we went a step too far in the latter.

For instance, if !databreaches@lemmy.zip became the one reference community on data breaches, that would be nice, we probably don't need a community on this topic on 4 other instances

[–] Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks for sharing!

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.cafe/post/4448309

 

When you look at https://beehaw.org/communities, you can see that there are only a few communities, but they are diverse enough to cover most of the topics you would have to discuss on the Internet.

I sometimes think that could be a model we could try to replicate across several instances:

It would allow to aggregate people around a few core communities and avoid dispersion and fragmentation. Of course, it would need some agreements in the community, and some people would probably want to keep their community as "the main one" opposed to the other, but that could still be valuable.

What do you think?

 

I'm mostly thinking about LW communities where nobody posts but which have active counterparts on other instances

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/19946388

An anticapitalist tech blog. Embrace the technology that liberates us. Smash that which does not.

 
 

Curious to see what niche movies the community knows

view more: ‹ prev next ›