Drewelite

joined 1 year ago
[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 7 months ago

Taxis / Uber, food delivery, truckers, towing, garbage collection, construction hauling, couriers, bus drivers, etc, etc. I agree this will be devastating at first. But it really doesn't have to be in the long run. As a society we need to stop equating someone's value to their labor.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How do I subscribe when the robot took my job?

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Make sure to turn it off so it doesn't ring when they try and call you back

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah I was thinking... would a Fallout show be goofy and colorful, or dark and horrific? Amazon said, yes. And it's great.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago

Well that's what human knowledge is lol. This is the AI Internet 😂 My guess is they will begin to diverge from human interest/comprehension if they don't have enough of their training data be human created.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 7 months ago

Whoa this is awesome, thanks

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 7 months ago

That's putting it lightly.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's trivial to copy an LLM, but if you mean self improvement: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10020

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

You're right that it doesn't save too much money making people more efficient. That's why they will replace employees instead. That's the threat.

Yes they make mistakes. So do people. They just have to make less than an employee does and we're on the right track for that. AI will always make mistakes and this is actually a step in the right direction. Deterministic systems that rely on concrete input and perfectly crafted statistical models can't work in the real world. Once the system it is trying to evaluate (most systems in the real world) is sufficiently complex, you encounter unknown situations where you have to spend infinite time and energy gathering information and computing... or guess.

Our company is small and our customer inquiries increased several fold because our product expanded. We were panicking thinking we needed to train and hire a whole customer support department overnight, where we currently have one person. But instead we implement AI representatives. Our feedback actually became more positive because these agents can connect with you instantly, pull nebulous requests from confusing messages, and alert the appropriate employee of any action needed. Does it make mistakes? Sure, not enough to matter. It's simple for our customer service person to reach out and correct the mistake.

I think people that think this isn't a big deal for AGI don't understand how the human mind works. I find it funny when they try and articulate why they think LLMs are just a trick. "It's not really creating anything, it's just pulling a bunch of relevant material from its training data and using it as a basis for a similar output." And... What is it you think you do?

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've worked office jobs at a few large corporations. I've noticed they like to lay off a department, see how long the other departments can get by splitting up the work, then when everything is on fire they open up hiring. But every now and then... they let go of a department and everything just keeps working. It's a strategy that seems to work, unfortunately.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I listed reasons people usually cite and why I don't think they're a good reason to assume there won't be progress. I agree it's over-hyped today, because people are excited about the obvious potential tomorrow. I think it's foolish to hide behind that as if it's proof that it doesn't have potential.

Let's say you're right and we hit a wall for 50 years on any progress on AI. There's nothing magical about the human brain's ability to make logical decisions on observations and learning. It's going to happen. And our current system of economy that attributes a person's value to their labor will be in deep shit when it happens. It could take a century to make an appropriate change here. We're already way behind, even with a set back to AI.

I think it's funny when people complain about AI learning from copyright. AI's express goal is to be similar to a human consciousness. Have you ever talked to a human who's never watched a TV show, or a movie, or read a book from this century? An AI that's not aware of those things would be like a useless alien to us.

If people just want to use legal hangups to stop AI, fair play. But that plan is doomed, infinite brainpower is just too valuable. Copyright isn't there to protect the little guy, that was the original 28 year law. Its current form was lobbied by corporations to stifle competition. And they'll dismantle it (or ignore it) in a heartbeat once it suits them.

[–] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah people think AI is what sci-fi movies sold them. Hyper intelligent - hyper aware sentient beings capable of love or blah blah blah. We'll get there, but corps don't need that. In fact that's the part they don't want. They need a mindless drone to replace the 80% of their workers doing brainless jobs.

view more: ‹ prev next ›