EABOD25

Well, best of luck to you when you speak to women in the wild

Meh. I went without underwear for a while. It's kind of freeing when I'm at home, but those times I have to run out and forget to put on shorts or pants without a belt, it's a little stressful lol. The first thing my wife does when she gets home is takes her bra off, so I ultimately guess it could be the same, but there's no social impacts if men don't wear underwear under their trousers when in public

1. is ironic because that's exactly how mega corps vote
2. Peasants (as you said) wouldn't be able to get their break without
3. that's a needed. 100% agree
4. what about people who are already consuming the bare minimum? What are they supposed to do?
5. 100% agree
6. 100% agree
7. wrong. That's a privilege. Privileges can be taken away. Freedom is the ability to retard and expect repercussions or advance humanity in a civilized manner. What you are referring to is anarchy, and anarchy doesn't have to be bad. It puts the power in the individual with no government influence. However anarchy relies strictly on human nature and dependency
8. 100%

Ngl. I've hit my nipples on things and it sucks. My dogs have ran their nails across them and they burn for the rest of the day. I totally feel that pain

However I'm a guy and have had to apologize multiple times to women because my eyes just trail down to the chest. I don't know psychosomatics of it, but it's not something I consciously intend to do.

Beyond that, I don't mind whether women do or don't wear a bra. Breastfeed in public if needed. It all should truly be none of my business. However, I donate to breast cancer research every year for a reason. And that reason is I think about boobs. My wife has my favorite pair though.

Anyway, I digress, I never really knew the original purpose of them and figured I could satiate my curiosity and have a conversation about boobs with people

I mean no offense, but after all of the work women have done to get the rights and regards that they have today (don't misunderstand me, there's still work that can be done), and excuse my assumption, but it would be more or less the woman's control of whether they would/should wear a bra, so the argument (I'm going to summarize to list to a single word. I mean no offense, but it's my perception. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) of whether you should or shouldn't is a feminist argument that feminist are the ones that argue about the most. However, I still believe "your body your right". Do what you want.

However I had 2 ulterior motives for asking: 1) to actually know where and why bras were first used 2) the vast majority of people (cis, trans, straight, gay, men, and women) enjoy boobs. There are people on the planet that sexualize boobs, but boobs are a hot topic. People enjoy talking about boobs, and to me it's a weird phenomenon. About the only exception I think to that rule would be gay men, but they can probably still appreciate a good pair of pups.

Again, I mean no offense. I just believe that some conversations about boobs are neither alienating or innapropriate. I hope I explained this in a way that isn't creepy. If it does seem creep, please let me know and I'll try to reword it

That's a thing that can happen!?

And what direct action would you propose?

Hope your descendants have it better

Very bleak of you

I'm semi retired, disabled, and a house husband. Sometimes I need a little chaos to feel something

I'm an optimist, so I'll believe one day we'll have a utopian society like in Star Trek. I ask politely you don't criticize me too harshly

I don't think Mr. Netanyahu knows what ceasefire means