Pic 1, Dog 1: "ummm, wtf?"

Dog 2: "TEEFIES!"

Pic 2, Dog 1: "...mom?"

Dog 2: "psst! ...can u hear da teefies..?"

GoT has entered the chat

"Spaghetti and sauce is a Nintendo trademark. You'll be hearing from out lawyers presently."

Copy.

Disengage

No. I'm not saying anything of the sort. What I'm saying is that you're full of shit, making stuff up that you have no proof of, and then you play the parrot, repeating your shit when pressed.

Unless you have a source that the dude violated ANYTHING that ISN'T that the old lady said so, present it.

And this is the sixth time we've made this circuit.

Disengage.

I'll take three!

I just received 10 psychic damage reading this. Time for a short rest.

All of it below the tropic of Capricorn

Did the conductor see his "violation?" Then provide the

SOURCE.

Ya can't, because all you have is a "he said/she said." And your racism had been on full display this entire interaction. So, you're back to the "no u" defense. Again.

Indeed. Full agreement.

They are going to look long and hard for someone who assaulted an old woman.

That is laughable, and the article i linked provides context to my position. Now, if you had clarified by saying the cops would look long and hard for someone that assaulted a "well known" or "wealthy" old woman, I'd have no notes. I believe you understand the difference.