Guntrigger

joined 7 months ago
[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

Well, sure. But Mr. Non-Woke apparently needs cow's milk in all three meals of the day anyway, so it didn't need to have milk with dinner specifically.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 months ago (11 children)

Why does it insist on accompanying dinner with a glass of milk?

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 59 points 6 months ago

Well he does have Junior in his name

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 months ago

That's fair enough. I don't really know much about the Roku TV enshittification thing other than snippets I've read on here.

I'm just trying to understand why an external device would be any better (for those who still have a working TV that is). Most are made by the same type of companies who make the Smart TVs. The Walmart ONN device for example, mentioned elsewhere in the thread as a great alternative, is literally a Roku device. Forgive me for not getting it.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

They're pushing the limits of this simulation to see how much bullshit we can tolerate. Turns out it's a LOT.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 18 points 6 months ago

But my company says it cares for the environment and does environmental things like improving algorithms for patches to reduce computing power needed and therefore save the energy worldwide (an actual example of a recent win by our environment consciousness team right after forcing thousands of people to RTO)

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

I'm the one getting aggressive? I think you need to read the whole thread.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So let me get this straight, I should not connect my TV of any brand to the Internet for fear they might do something that Roku did? If Roku are trailblazers, why do you think other companies selling streaming boxes won't also go down that path?

Why are streaming boxes safe but not Smart TVs?

Why do you think Roku will care that you won't tolerate them if you are and never were going to be a customer?

Moving the goalposts

Absolutely ridiculous. This whole thread is about reasons to use it over the native TV. I'm honestly interested. I've seen no solid reasoning. [Ignoring that this was a reply to your snark that I can get it delivered instead of "going out" to get one when I was actually asking why I should and you knew I was]

It really just seems like you're intentionally ignoring my answers

You're the one ignoring me! I asked if you're talking "like a Chromecast" because I have one of those and if that is the kind of device you're talking about, I can compare 3 different methods of watching anything on my TV that are better in every way.

I don't care to go and buy another similar device without a good reason, and I was simply interested in what the landscape looks like right now.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No the conversation was to explain why an external device would be better than a native device. Nobody seems to be able to explain that.

I would honestly be interested in some performance comparisons between say Samsung TV UI and that of various streaming boxes, but all I can find is streaming boxes being compared against one another.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 0 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Roku has already begun

But I don't have a Roku TV... someone in here even suggested a Roku streaming device would be better but that makes zero sense.

It's $20 and you can order it and have it delivered to your door.

Yeah, if there was a reason to buy it.

I am being very explicit.

About the Roku injection of ads and anti-consumerism. Why would buying a streaming device made by another corporation be any better.

...okay, go for it?

I think our wires got crossed, I was asking you for evidence.

I kind of get the gist of what you're saying. But I just wanted to understand why there's a "doom and gloom, down with all Smart TVs" attitude, when a lot of the streaming boxes are still made my these mega corps and could potentially have the same issues.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz -2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

If it's about more than privacy. Please enlighten me. My whole point is that no-one wants to go out and buy an extra device to perform the same function as the TV they already have with vague hand wavy warnings. If it's true peril, you'll be able to explain why.

To believe you all I would need is like, a YouTube video of someone booting the TV and the device up. Does it need multiple remotes? If so it's definitely slower. Are we talking Chromecast type dongle? If so, I used one of those on the TV before my Smart TV (purely because there was an app I needed that wasn't available on Xbox). It was slower, less reliable, worse quality and more of a chore than the Xbox, which in turn is much slower than my current TV.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz -4 points 6 months ago (8 children)

If you buy a proper streaming device instead of an XBOX you will have an identical experience as you would just using your TV.

Got it, so I don't need to buy a seperate streaming device.

I get where you're coming from with the privacy aspects and whatnot, but I very much doubt that a seperate streaming box will get me a better experience than turning on my TV and having Netflix booted in 3 seconds.

view more: ‹ prev next ›