Jimmycrackcrack

joined 1 year ago
[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Well at least it clears up this circumstance I was starting to think I was going crazy.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can you helpncelar something up for me? Ever since Firefox introduced the copy link without site tracking feature I have been thoroughly confused what it actually does because every time I've ever used it the URL has been exactly the same whether I used the feature or just traditional "copy link". Here on this Lemmy thread, using my Lemmy client Lemmy Connect, the link in the parent comment to yours and also the link in your comment appear identical to me. What's up with that?

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't foresee Lemmy specifically reaching levels of popularity comparable to platforms like Twitter or Reddit. Barring some very strange disastrous upheaval of the whole landscape they and their ilk will continue to be Leviathans even with decisions at the top that look like outright sabotage. There is so much inertia. Maybe those two examples might disappear, but only if they're devoured by another just like them.

I can see Lemmy and similar Federated platforms with their quite sizeable yet comparatively miniscule user bases carrying on as they are and even growing a little bit and having some effect on the zeitgeist with the occasional piece of local culture seeping in to the wider platforms though people there will likely not know that's where it came from. I also think efforts like Threads or likely something similar that comes after will be where the fediverse meets any mainstream success essentially becoming part of those bigger platforms in some way I can't yet predict in detail.

The big appeal of Lemmy is ideological and technical, this will always limit the number of people drawn to it. If there weren't already giants in this space that wouldn't matter because there'd be a snowball effect that would draw crowds who came because of other people not because of any interest in how the platform functions or ideals to pursue and with those crowds could come more crowds until you have a critical mass. But with the situation as it is now, the big crowds that draw yet more crowds still, are elsewhere so you'll only ever have enthusiasts or ideologues that go out of their way to be here.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

There's windows only laptops?

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

You have my vote for your interpretation, that had always been my understanding too.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fucking love halloumi

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hopefully in a year or two they'll eventually just call it Twitter or maybe if we're lucky it will go out of business and then they'll probably still just call it Twitter because the X thing would then have just been a short lived portion of its overall lifespan.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Knowing my memory I'd forget it all very soon after it happened and need a history book to help me recall any of it and the stuff left out or distorted would end up warping that recollection enough that it'd be so unreliable I may as well believe the historians. I can scarcely remember the previous day as it is.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know why the kittens should be the one that hurt me the most to read but well, it did.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn did they get shamed to oblivion at least?

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the confusion is that you seem not to like what is presumably Christmas because you perceive it to be fake but Festivus, is literally, actually, fake since it comes from a plot of a TV series from the 90s and has only been celebrated by a broader range of people since as a fun tribute to that series. You could argue that the fact that people really celebrate it means it necessarily can't be fake, but then by that logic...

view more: ‹ prev next ›