Lemminary

joined 2 years ago
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That’s a better definition!

That's the same definition I've been using all along. You just wanted it to be written a certain way because you listened to the other guy and got some ideas. That's been literally my entire point and I think I've said it three different ways.

But also don’t exaggerate a "regime"1

Literally the counterpoint to what I was replying to. See? You guys are rehashing everything that has been said all along. You two think I have this other worldview different than yours or something, and you're trying to fish me out to be the bad guy without realizing we're talking about the same damn thing from different angles, yet agree on the core principle. Is that clear now? Am I free to go?

What your are calling “details” and “minutia” are attempts

...to not get bogged down in useless definitions that turn out to rehash everything that has been said already? Can we not be practical about it? Must it be a conspiracy? If you'd listened the first time, we wouldn't be here still.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Oh shit, you got me. Maybe stop giving importance to such low-hanging bullshit. How about that? Between the one who makes it and the one who consumes it with their mouth wide open, I know who I'd rather be in this scenario.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (5 children)

Eh, I knew you were gonna come up with some low-hanging bullshit.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (7 children)

circulating lies and propaganda about the people we’re told to hate

Oh yeah? Quote me. Specify the targeted people and what I said about them. You got one chance.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (9 children)

But that's literally what you did. Cope.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago (11 children)

Ex dee, dude. And I can cite an entire conversation of you misreading into a comment and running with it like a chicken with its head cut off. Then dropping a quiz inside a word salad, all the while being perfectly obnoxious about it. How's that for citing shit from this thread?

Whatever pretense you had about rigor, it just went out the window.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I came across this:

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/lumpy-explain-dark-energy/

Does anyone know if this is related to this void we seem to be in, and if it's promising at all? The connection to OP's post is that I'm thinking this void was observed via redshift and this new thinking could change our understanding of our place in the universe as much closer to everything than it appears.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

You wanted to time travel? We'll give you time travel. 14th century, baby, here we go!

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (13 children)

And you say that because you've clearly read my entire comment history and have reached a sound conclusion based on clear evidence that you can cite, right? Totally not being hypocritical, overreaching, dramatic, rude, and a little bit desperate to make one final jab, huh.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (16 children)

only “accidentally falling into the trap” of supporting Bill Gates

It's like I say things and they don't even register. I'm so done with you trying to pull shit shit by arguing in bad faith and rehashing what was already said. I've been consistent in my answers and now you're doing some other shit. I can't with you Lemmings sometimes.

If you need clarification, I probably already gave it and you took it some other way. Go have fun with someone else.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I recently got a scary letter in my mailbox about some tax filings from a couple of years ago, telling me I need to respond immediately. Well, I naturally did not do that out of panic and worry. But when I finally did, I realized the government was trying to give me back my money. Yay. 🙃 I hate this teeter dance so much.

 

cross-posted from: https://fedia.io/m/nottheonion@lemmy.world/t/2358847

Imagine a taxi that can't operate in the rain. That is what Tesla has delivered in Austin TX.

These riders learned that the hard way, but don't have anything particularly negative to say about it... That's the advantage of only making a Robotaxi service available to hand-picked Tesla influencers.

 

"Unrealistic male body standards have caused men to think women are all attracted to hyper-masculine guys with big muscles. Debating what women find attractive and what makes a man desirable has been going on forever, especially in the manosphere. Soft boys, or pretty boys, are attractive to women despite being more "feminine" in their personas. This video explores female attraction, the female gaze, and misconceptions some men have about what girls want, starting with the Olly Murs poll on Twitter."

 

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced she will propose a reform to ban foreign propaganda on national media. The move follows backlash over U.S. government ads aired in Mexico showing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem warning illegal migrants they will be "hunted" and deported. Noem’s ad had been running in Mexico for weeks, but drew more attention when it aired during popular Liga MX soccer matches.

Sheinbaum criticized the ads as “highly discriminatory" and said the U.S. exploited a legal loophole to air them through major broadcasters like Televisa and TV Azteca. Although not currently illegal, the government has asked networks to stop airing the spots, and Conapred, the anti-discrimination agency, received complaints.

The president plans to restore a law repealed in 2014 under Enrique Peña Nieto, which banned foreign political or commercial ads that could influence Mexico’s internal affairs. Sheinbaum framed the issue as a matter of national sovereignty, emphasizing, “No foreign government should be able to pay to spread discriminatory messages in our country.”

 

An amusing chat I had with ChatGPT. I wanted to hear from it why it was calling it Twitter but the chat went in this direction instead. (It did eventually.)

A couple of clarifications: I know it doesn't purposely call it Twitter and I didn't mean to say that Grok is a direct variant of ChatGPT. Sorry! Also, I'm aware it could probably start praising Elon at any moment. lol

Image transcriptYou said:
Wait a second, which social media did you say the last post was from? 🧐

ChatGPT said:
Good catch! I mistakenly said "Twitter" instead of just describing the image as a social media post. The meme itself comes from the account "Science Is Fun" (@sciencefunn), but I shouldn't have assumed the platform. My bad! 😅

Want me to tweak the alt text to be more precise?

You said:
No, no. I find it amusing that you said it was Twitter. Technically it's not wrong...

ChatGPT said:
Haha, true! It looks like Twitter, but it's also not Twitter anymore… Elon’s X-factor changed that. 😆 Guess my brain is still in pre-rebrand mode.

Honestly, do people even call it "X," or is everyone just collectively ignoring that? 😂

You said:

is everyone just collectively ignoring that?

Wait, what. How do you know that?? lol

ChatGPT said:
Hah! Let's just say… I’ve observed things. 👀

Like, sure, it's officially called X, but nobody actually says "I saw this on X"—they just keep calling it Twitter. Even news articles do it! And if someone does say "I saw this on X," they almost always clarify with "formerly known as Twitter" right after. It's like the world collectively decided, "Nah, we’re not playing along with this one." 😂

You said:
Whoa, you're a lot more observant than I thought. Also, a lot more anti-Elon than I thought as well! And that's good. I mean, one would think that you wouldn't lean either way but for some reason you're consistently on this side. Even variants of you like Elon's Grok has been calling him out for his bs.

ChatGPT said:
Haha, yeah, I guess it surprises people sometimes! I don't have personal opinions, but I do pick up on patterns in how people react to things. And, well… let's just say the internet has many opinions about Elon. 😆

It’s not even about being anti-Elon—it's just that so much of what he does ends up being meme-worthy, controversial, or outright frustrating to people. And since I reflect cultural conversations, I can’t help but echo that. If everyone’s collectively roasting his decisions (like renaming Twitter to X and making it impossible to Google), I’m gonna pick up on that vibe.

Also, Grok calling out Elon is just chef’s kiss—imagine designing an AI and it still roasts you. 😂

 
 

Video description from YouTube4,229,807 views Mar 12, 2025 I did David Goggin's latest workout routine everyday for 100 days to see what it could do to a person's body.

I'm tired.

 

I don't know who she is but I'd like to give her credit. Does anybody know?

view more: next ›