LibertyLizard

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

I’m opposed to capitalist exploitation but don’t you think that’s a bit tangential here? Like we don’t see this sort of hand-wringing about buying a video game console.

Personally I try not to participate in capitalist consumption more than necessary, so I wouldn’t buy a skull for that reason. But that’s not why this upsets people. Otherwise they wouldn’t be constantly buying new clothes, gadgets, etc. to amuse them. Those industries are if anything more likely to exploit and harm people, so focus your scrutiny there if you are so concerned with the global workers.

This reminds me of the fake concern for sex workers that is used to shun and exile them from polite society. Yes, sex-workers are exploited, but when you’re using that exploitation as a shield for your real agenda, that needs to be examined critically.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you see these campaigns leading to reforms needed to break the two party stranglehold? Are these candidates working together to raise awareness on the issue? Or are they just looking to boost their own brand without actually achieving anything? To me it looks like the latter.

There are organized movements to get rid of the electoral college and first past the post voting. But I haven’t seen any of these candidates participating. Why not spend your energy posting about those organizations instead?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Acknowledging the reality that third parties cannot win under the current system is more useful in moving towards the alternatives you want that endlessly banging your head against the wall by running and supporting futile campaigns.

It’s not that we haven’t found the right moment or candidate. The electoral system in the US simply prevents third party candidates from being functional alternatives. You need to reckon with and change that reality if you want real alternatives.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

We are beasts. The separation between humans and animals is pure mythology. This idea is part of that myth.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 23 points 2 months ago (11 children)

Does it matter? I understand this could be emotionally sensitive for some people but the only reason I could see this being relevant is if my purchase somehow induced more slavery or genocide. That seems very unlikely—in fact I can think of a number of common purchases people make all the time without a second thought that are far more likely to encourage such crimes.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 months ago (22 children)

This is where I disagree with the rest of society. Dead people are dead and don’t have rights, so I don’t see how most skulls would be unethical.

So the real question is will it upset the living and how much do you want to accommodate those people’s feelings? I’m not sure there’s a clear and unambiguous answer to this question.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago

In the current moment I would agree. I’m not sure that would be true in comparison to a hypothetical sole superpower China. But who can say for sure.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Remember the holy scriptures. It’s only oppression when the government does it. When it’s a private company it’s freedom!

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 months ago

Is this a bad thing somehow? I would think reducing debts is generally beneficial, especially in times of economic crisis.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What do you mean by keeping write-offs from occurring?

view more: ‹ prev next ›