Liz

joined 1 year ago
[–] Liz@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These comments remind me about how when you try to do something great, the vast majority of the feedback will be from people who were never going to buy into your idea in the first place. The fact that they're on version 5 tells me there's demand for an ethically sourced, user-repairable phone with a long support life. Go start your own phone company if you don't like it.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Can't get one off eBay or something?

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I bought a phone without a headphone jack. So I bought a little adapter and keep it in my case. Then my headphones started to fail and I got a pair that could do both Bluetooth and aux. Now I have headphones that can be used with a dead battery or can be used without a wire. Win-win.

Would I prefer a headphone jack? Yes. But the adapter lives on the end of the removable aux cable, so the functional difference is minimal. Especially since I also have wireless charging, so I can avoid the very minor "can't charge and use AUX at the same time" problem.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah when I need to get a new phone I'm 100% getting a FairPhone. My last phone lived for multiple years past the security updates. All my phones over the years have died to some trivial problem that wasn't worth fixing (e.g. bad charging port). But a fixable phone with eight years of security updates? Sign me the fuck up. The only reason my current phone isn't a FairPhone is because they didn't sell in the US when I needed a new one.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago

I've seen video of a small lady with a handgun chasing out four home intruders while taking wild, panicked shots. Yes, these guys ran, but not everyone will. Two and a half shots per intruder doesn't sound like a fun time.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We're going to go back to the old model of trust, before videos and photos existed. Consistent, coherent stories from sources known to be trustworthy will be key. Physical evidence will be helpful as well.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

"This body is spoken for."

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Which is really just a bad choice. We could have proper town planning if we wanted, and in fact we used to have it. But then we knocked down neighborhoods to make room for highways and that was that. We can work our way back to good towns of any size, if we wanted.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Lol, that dad is so worn out.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

No one ever reads the article. What do we want, context?

I'm not gonna call it the world's best home defense shooting, but I'm not gonna call it some kind of injustice.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The guy was trying to break in, having smashed a window and was working and lock from the inside. He wasn't just drunkenly banging on the door.

According to previously unreported details that police released about the incident Wednesday, Donofrio repeatedly knocked, banged and kicked on the front door "while manipulating the door handle" in trying to enter the home.

A female resident called 911 as Donofrio kicked the door, while a male resident went to retrieve a firearm elsewhere in the home, the news release says. The homeowner owned the gun legally, “for the purpose of personal and home protection,” police said.

While the woman was on the phone with police, Donofrio broke a glass window on the front door "and reached inside to manipulate the doorknob," at which point the male resident fired the shot through the broken window, striking Donofrio in his upper body, police said.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's 100% how journalism works. If you're an expert in a field a journalist might call you asking to confirm a statement or a fact that they know. If you correct them and tell them they're wrong, or that it's not that simple, they'll just go find a different expert to confirm their narrative.

Now, to be fair, this style of research isn't exactly wrong, so long as the writer really is fairly knowledgeable in their own right, and is just looking for an outside source they can point to so it's not just their own opinion. The problem in the style of writing is when the author does this for things they they don't understand very well or are just their opinions.

view more: ‹ prev next ›