The headline also leaves out this specific caveat of the study (emphasis mine):
While such measures can yield significant other benefits, and may also reduce traffic volumes locally
So it does have impact on car use. It just hasn't reduced overall car use because we're doing too little. Got it.
That is an extremely loaded sentence. It is missing "in the specific example that is current earth"
Stop giving this oxygen
Bullshit idk.
Probably something about being able to listen in the background or switch between AP and ad-hoc WiFi modes.
Federal procedures argue in their favor, yes.
Oh I see what you meant.
Per customer* cost.
Let me guess, it's a webpage?
Yeah that's the only difference. Usually land is cheaper. But building high in the middle of nowhere is only like 5% more expensive.
Cost. It's slightly cheaper. And I do mean slightly.
As I said in my comment the pedophile label makes sense here. Although they're both. People use them interchangeably for some reason.
This distinction only means something for psychology.
And I get that the vast majority of child rapes happen because children are more vulnerable HOWEVER at some point you can just afford an adult prostitute 1000 times over if you actually want that. It's clear that these people actually wanted to rape children. So the pedophile label makes sense.
What part of tiny pie charts was necessary? Just make a heatmap but in dots.