NoAttorney8414

joined 1 year ago
[–] NoAttorney8414@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I mean… sure but if that’s your use case due to work then you’re probably better served by a digital Casio than a luxury dive watch. I could time my lifts at the gym with the bezel on my SMP but I still use an Apple Watch for that because it’s a better fit for the job.

[–] NoAttorney8414@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

There's no such thing as "value for money" in the luxury watch space. All luxury watches are overpriced - that is the whole point of "luxury" - duh. Speaking along the same lines, I saw a reviewer try to justify the price difference between two dive watches because one was METAS certified whilst the other was only COSC certified - literally for 99.999% of people this won't make a difference. Most of these luxury watch goobers take their watches off to wash their hands.

[–] NoAttorney8414@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Walls - scraping against a wall leaves the nastiest scratches

[–] NoAttorney8414@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have the Murph 38 & it’s a great little watch. It dresses up and down nicely. Wore it in Europe recently & swapped between black shell cordovan and ash grey leather. The cathedral hands and faux patina colour gives it a lil somethin’ extra. Personally prefer it to the Baby Alpinist even though people are quick to recommend it over the Murph