this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Watches

0 readers
1 users here now

A community for watch & horology discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a post from a few days ago, I noticed that someone mentioned that they were afraid to post about their dislike of the Tudor BB58 for fear of downvoting. You know what? The BB is a boring watch that's not worth the money, and Tudor wouldn't be half as popular as it is without the connection to Rolex. If Rolexes were as attainable as they were in past years, cut that by a factor of 10. Would you really buy a BB if the reality were that you could just save a little bit more and get a Rolex Submariner? That's my hot take. What's yours?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoAttorney8414@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

There's no such thing as "value for money" in the luxury watch space. All luxury watches are overpriced - that is the whole point of "luxury" - duh. Speaking along the same lines, I saw a reviewer try to justify the price difference between two dive watches because one was METAS certified whilst the other was only COSC certified - literally for 99.999% of people this won't make a difference. Most of these luxury watch goobers take their watches off to wash their hands.

[–] CosmoKing2@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

This is so wrong. When I'm at my weekend home in the Mariana Trench (seasonal, of course) I frequently rely on my watch. How else would I gauge the depths, time, and pressure? With much more modern, precise, computerized equipment in the submersible? Pshaw.

For real. Certification flies out the window once your new watch gets banged around, even slightly.

[–] LiquidSean@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah people don’t understand that the price of a luxury good can be a feature. If you could buy a Patek for $100 no one would care about it. People crave the exclusivity… marketing at its finest lol

[–] Nerazzurro9@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You say that now, but when I’m exactly 1.5 seconds late to the big meeting and you’re 3.75 seconds late, you’ll wish your watch had this kind of accuracy.

[–] matchooooh@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago
[–] R3dsnow75@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

smirks in Casio F91w

[–] kidNurse@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Hey, I'm a nurse and I need a watch that can handle a good wash 50 times a day.

[–] owiseone23@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

two dive watches because one was METAS certified whilst the other was only COSC certified - literally for 99.999% of people this won't make a difference.

Exactly, and for the 0.0001% of people for whom it actually does matter, they'd be better off getting a G shock or something because it'll be more durable, keep better time, more readable in the dark, longer lasting battery, etc. No point in talking about practicality for something that's inherently impractical.

[–] Prisma_Cosmos@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

The anti-magnetism part of the METAS testing is particularly silly, completely pointless and just for marketing.

[–] kosnosferatu@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mmm plenty of people work near large magnets and the metas cert guarantees protection from 15000 gauss, or an MRI. And the fact that each cased up watch gets in water resistance tested is a plus.

[–] NoAttorney8414@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I mean… sure but if that’s your use case due to work then you’re probably better served by a digital Casio than a luxury dive watch. I could time my lifts at the gym with the bezel on my SMP but I still use an Apple Watch for that because it’s a better fit for the job.

[–] lambda_male@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think you’re conflating “relative value” with “absolute value.” Sure, a $5k mechanical watch can’t compete with a cheap quartz if the metric is timekeeping. But if you’re comparing multiple different luxury watches for finishing, accuracy, and other specs, there’s bound to be models that are offering more features for less money.

[–] CTMalum@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Just because most people won’t know the difference doesn’t mean that there isn’t a justification in the price difference. You could say that about laymen in anything. METAS certification has more testing and I’m assuming it costs more.