NoneOfUrBusiness

You got many answers, but part of it is because of shit like this.

They're both not elected anymore and a resistance organization. They were elected on a platform of not-exclusively-peaceful resistance (peaceful resistance inside Palestine and especially inside Gaza was render impossible by Israel by 2006-2007, so their resistance activities are now exclusively violent). Resistance activities are supported by the population of Gaza, even if many don't support Hamas specifically. If your point is that October 7th implies they don't care about Gazan lives, that's patently false. If that's not what you meant, then explain what you mean by "they don't care about Gazan lives".

Pray tell, which elected leaders?

I've actually seen some Muslim American leader (not sure who, maybe the mayor of Dearborn?) saying something like this. At least with Republicans in charge democrats would need to oppose them instead of gleefully supporting the genocide. Not sure how much this logic checks out, but it's a thing I guess.

Like Sundial said, she's not doing or saying anything new. She's basically saying "nothing will fundamentally change", which is a problem when the current situation she doesn't intend to change involves the US bankrolling genocide.

See, that's what they want you to believe. Nobody's pissing on you, they're taking a big fat shit and you're in ground zero.

I don't think anyone on Lemmy seriously believes in trickle down economics.

Okay this is nothing more than American copium. Israel survives off American aid and trade, and threatening to cut either off would get them to back off faster than you could say genocide. This isn't theory; it's been done before.

I know this is a massive low hanging fruit, but I'll say it anyway. They need more people the right color.

Wait is it ð? I thought it'd be ðe.