SmackemWittadic

UHHHG!

Killing in the name of!

I mean in the US it's currently "slavery is okay if you get thrown in jail first".

So it's unfortunately not that big of a leap in their logic

You're much older than a boomer Mr. Sun Zu

I feel like we should name it after the legendary @SatansMaggotyCumFart

Oh I absolutely agree, some things don't need to be "smart".

Imagine if someone put a microchip in a potato peeler claiming that it would add features like "sensing the amount of pressure applied to the potato to ensure clean peels". The reason they haven't done that is that data would only benefit the user, and they can't think of a way to have it benefit the company's profit margins.

I wish products followed your lead and had no AI features, 1995 Toyota Corolla :/

Which is generally why education is one of the things the rich are trying to hold control over

Absolutely. Like why in the world would the article have a list of features included in each model of router?

I was thinking it was meant to line up with the year 2000 (as shown on the axis at the bottom), but then I saw that somehow 2001 was behind the vertical axis which makes it not make sense at all

Triple AAA

I absolutely love AAAAAAAAA games

I say this a lot to people on Lemmy, but everyone here (including you) is honestly so much nicer and more emotionally intelligent than people on other places on the internet

You're smarter while taking a dump than most people are while voting for who represents them, as well as being much more willing to rethink things when questioned.