TeddE

Because we live in a world where it's easy to block offensive words, so much so that the powers that be like to pretend that blocking talk about the 'cest is somehow an effective tool in combating it. (When instead it just coins an endless stream of new words that act as synonyms for 'the bad words'. 'Cause funk you. Funk you to heck!)

Please drink verification can to continue

Missed opportunities:

• that German guy who wanted to be an artist
• Trump as a weeb

You're not wrong. But I low-key wish to hate you for how simple and inevitable you've put it. I won't shoot the messenger, but I want to.

^this

I don't need the tool giving me its opinion. I usually use alternativeto.net to find more open alternatives, but if someone has tried open source and is looking for proprietary solutions, doesn't hurt me to see all options presented reasonably fairly.

Openalternative.co is "Made by Piotr Kulpinski. Website may contain affiliate links."

Having apolitical fun over in !selfhosted@lemmy.world 😁

Edit: !imsorryjon@lemmy.world & !imaginarydragons@leminal.space look apolitical to me, too

I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place.

I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit.

The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors).

But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅

I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why?

I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco.

Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence.

You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world?

You do realize that reads like you're off your meds.

I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the"

Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to?

Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2

Are you conflating Osama Bin Laden with Saddam Hussein, for whom as summarized by wikipedia:

In 2003, a US-led coalition invaded Iraq, falsely accusing him of developing weapons of mass destruction and of having ties with al-Qaeda.

Unless you have that evidence the world was looking for I don't want to spread old, debunked propaganda.