Who is going to bring charges? The DOJ? The fox I guarding the hen house.
Vorticity
I think this is just an example of trying to stretch "we don't know shit" into an article of sifficient length.
If I wanted to give benefit of the doubt, maybe they mean that 2/3 of vacancies are caused by being held empty for speculation. Even that doesn't make snes to me, though. It's not like you are unable to sell properties that have tenants.
Where are you getting the statistic of 2/3 of housing being kept empty for speculation? A quick look outside tells me that is utter bullshit.
The most obvious slight of hand here is the suggestion that employer contributions shouldn't count as part of what employees paid in. That is part of their compensation and shouldn't be ignored when suggesting that younger generations are paying for baby boomer's social security.
To me this reads like someone is trying to poison younger people against social security so they won't complain when it is taken away.
I'd argue that this highly depends on what state you live in. Idaho is one of the most backward, conservative, intolerant states in the country.
[https://www.odditycentral.com/news/door-head-ants-use-their-large-flat-heads-as-doors-to-shut-down-their-nests.html](Here is a short article on them.) According to the article, they stand their ground, even while their head is under attack. Pretty neat ants!
To be clear, they published the rule to the federal register. If the I junctions are lifted, the rule will immediately go into effect. This has no immediate effect and hopefully never will.
Please tell me this is a satire account. Please?
Well, I'm a dumbass. Thanks!
The Japanese part of this is evidenced by the fact that some traffic lights are blue rather than green. As far as I know, they are standardizing everything to green now to avoid any confusion, but some older lights are still blue because the words were the same for blue and green.

Who is going to prosecute? The current DOJ?