aubeynarf

joined 11 months ago
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

vinyls

FYI it’s called a “record”, or music could be “on vinyl”. They were never referred to as “vinyls”.

Also VCRs were never called “VHS’s”

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

He does respect your right to vote for whoever you want though!

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

What are the specified offenses though?

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

reminder that they are hand counting ballots that the ballot marking machine printed out, instead having of the computerized polling system the Republican governor put in a few years ago to ensure accuracy count them.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Kamala Harris is not killing anyone, nor is she in charge of US foreign policy. She doesn’t have executive authority, and she’s not the secretary of state. Even then, Israel is waging the war, not the US.

The Muslim and Arab population in the US is also not all Palestinian. I would bet a small fraction are.

To people outside your bubble, this is exactly the kind of intentionally misrepresented and extreme rhetoric that makes it seem like you and your cohorts are either stupid or working for a Trump win.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Because that’s a vote for Trump in a swing state, not because “they’re angry you’re not a democrat”

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can get a bluetooth connected mechanical keyboard (and mouse!) and use a tablet.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What do you think is the best example of a socialist country?

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

And he pretty solidly endorsed Trump - while the Democratic candidate is literally running on taxing billionaires more.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

no dude, the stakes are high and nobody wants Trump to win. it is a tense situation.

I am sure plenty of people would be happy to see you express your third-party vote if it doesn’t mean a swing state goes to Trump.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Ah yes, “both parties are the same”.

Except one embraces diversity, labor, a more progressive tax system, infrastructure spending, criminal justice reform, public education, public health insurance, food/income assistance, climate action, and the rule of law.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 months ago

For the time being, it would effectively move fringe-party votes to the nearest major party - ensuring that e.g. Trump doesnt win if the majority of people had Harris or some third party candidate ranked above Trump.

Current “third” parties have a long way to go before they would end up in the winning slot - but, presuming the elimination rounds’ stats are published and not just the final winner, we could better gauge the support for them since voters could show preference for them on the ballot without “wasting their vote”.

After a while, evidence of sustained support may snowball, or a particularly compelling candidate may be ranked above a “major” party candidate on a majority of ballots - leading to a win.

view more: ‹ prev next ›