I don't know the site that much, but I know that "harmful to minors" can mean anything.
blujan
joined 2 years ago
I think he means pages are presented as static html+css pages, generated dinamically on the back end
Probably federation would have started with him, knowing how he wanted to keep reddit open source and for more people to have their own servers
I totally agree, just explained OP's point
I agree, I'm just explaining OP's logic
The point of contention here is not that OP doesn't like this kind of verification, but that he believes that Twitter is making up the sign in attempt to get OP to actually log in and report higher usage metrics in Q3.
I don't think OP opposes 2FA, at least not from the info he posted.
Mexican United States*
Fuck @spez@reddit.com
Even then i think twitter works (or used to) because of the algorithm that kept you getting more content, which mastodon doesn't have (nor shouldn't) but with content agregators as long as you are subscribed to stuff that interests you you only need to hit a certain number of users for content to keep flowing.
It's the difference between subscribing to subjects rather than to people.
The last Carrie has great pace and then feels so rushed at the end