borth

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To that I'd say, "don't attribute to ignorance what can easily be explained by greed"

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dang. Idk, until full recovery, I wouldn't classify a "skull split open" to be "not in danger for their life" ๐Ÿ’€

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Beezus fucking Cthulhu. Wtf.

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Hey you! You're finally awake!

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That show is a gold mine. Pun not intended but VERY welcome lol.

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

So by celebrating it a day early, it's a loophole, and god can't get mad.

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

"And I think that thatโ€™s going to be just very exciting for the..."


Plebs? He almost slipped lol

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The harm to people flying in private jets is much more important than spam links. According to their own "Oversight Board".

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 weeks ago

I think your first paragraph only applies to US or US-like countries. I learned how to navigate unregulated Internet to download most things I could fit, and then expanded into more technical knowledge as I grew up. I know of the things you said in your first paragraph now, but I did not grow up beside them to have learned what I know today, or even what I knew back then. These computers were expensive (for us?) at first, so very few people had them, and then a few years later they were more abundant and easier for us to even have a chance to learn about them.

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe what they're really saying is " you guys are fine with them doing it but not us!??"

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A true visionary. Thank you for your contributions to the local network that benefinutted from those actions ๐Ÿค˜

[โ€“] borth@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

โ€œ[T]he court finds that, by reproducing the content of the works (books) in dispute, without the consent of the authors, there has been a violation of the patrimonial copyright of the plaintiffs,โ€ the Court of Appeals added.

You know what else reproduces the content of the works, with or without consent from the authors, a... Monitor. All those filthy pirates using monitors to read their pirated books. ๐Ÿคฎ They should sue the monitor manufacturers. Hell, they should sue Microsoft too, for also reproducing the pirated content and allowing them to hit "save" ๐Ÿ˜ก

view more: next โ€บ