That's called a PICNIC - Problem In Chair Not In Computer.
em2
Then the article is accurate because no lessons were learned.
Smile 2. All three seasons of Fire Country.
Heck yeah
Oh, definitely not what I thought or intended. Thanks for the heads up and kind reply. For clarity, I believe those cameras shouldn't be installed or used, especially under this administration.
There is a question on the constitutionality of automated surveillance technology, the type of data that is being collected, who has access to them, and how they are using it. Additionally, some other concerns I can think of off the top of my head are:
- Are the taxpayers funding this?
- Is my data being sold?
- If so, who is profiting?
- Where is supporting data showing this type of surveillance is needed?
- What demographical areas are these cameras more prevalent in? Aka are there a subset of peoples being targeted by this type of surveillance?
- What are the rules and regulations agencies need to follow with the data they capture with this tool?
There's also searXNG (https://docs.searxng.org/ which is a customisable search. I like to use Paulgo.io.
I don't think it matters if it causes confusion. I believe LE are supposed to identify themselves accurately.
There are many species of lithops that are endangered, with research and conservation efforts in place.
For example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629915327782