this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
419 points (97.3% liked)

politics

24719 readers
2935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make "the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity" a felony.

"I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity," she wrote. "It will be a felony offense."

She added: "We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 166 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 65 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Alas "express purpose" is in there. Clearly the express purpose for petrol companies is profit. And CO2, other pollutants are just inadvertent things that happened on the way to (destroying the planet for) profit. I mean they only sold the petrol products, they didn't force people that purchased the gasoline to burn it. Maybe we can go after the combustion engine producers?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So one could say they hobby at creating potassium iodide, but its expensive to pay to dispose of, so I dump it out of the back of an aircraft that was hired. There was no intention of actually seeding the clouds and making it rain, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago

All pollution?!? Make all pollution illegal?!?!?

That’s what it is, right?

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Felony to operate your air conditioner. Awesome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 118 points 5 days ago (4 children)

What an absolute fucking idiot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 63 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If this unintentionally regulates greenhouse gas emissions I’m going to laugh so hard.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Express purpose probably saves them. The express purpose is to vent externalities

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

It would be beautiful if this dimwit bumbled her way into making the world a better place....but we're probably in the wrong timeline for that

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe they'll unintentionally outlaw pollution like when the Republicans accidentally legalized cannabis in 2018

[–] III@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Sadly, all it will take is some CEO to publicly state "I didn't intend to pollute the environment. I dumped dangerous chemicals into nature because I wanted more money. Yes, I knew my actions would modify the weather, as this legislation states. But that was not my express purpose. My purpose was to be able to afford my 17th yacht so my peers would accept me."

Perfectly legal.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 77 points 5 days ago (4 children)

So would preventing “geoengineering” also prevent trying to stop climate change?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 5 days ago

She only knows that word because someone told her today

She's a bloody idiot

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I honestly can't tell whether her intent is to block any counter-climate change projects or if this is just a dumb chemtrails thing.

I mean, I assume it's chemtrails, given the source, but it could easily be a "I like the smell of forest fires, and you'll reduce hurricane intensity over my dead body." Given the source.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tungsten5@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I haven’t read the article or comments yet. Just the post title. I am afraid of the amount of brain cells I am about to lose. I’m going in, will update in a moment.

Edit: what the fuck did I just read. A new bill to stop a conspiracy theory? MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Thermite@lemmings.world 17 points 4 days ago

Does this make "Rollin' coal" illegal?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is performative ignorance, to please the home schooled bible toting cretins who vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

All this is gonna stop is cloud seeding, since that is literally the only way in which we manipulate the weather.

Well... On purpose, I mean. If this has the side effect of outlawing all greenhouse emissions because it's altering the weather in form of making shit hotter, that's a win.

Edit: Also I am reminded of the time some PR lady for HAARP said the array can manipulate the weather because, technically, it could punch a hole in clouds directly above it. Which I thought was just stupid, even as a joke, because they were trying to squash the rumors that it was some kind of hurricane machine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Misting fans are now a felony

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are they literally just laying the groundwork to frame Democrats for weather modifications so they can blame all of climate change on us and create a modern day witch hunt? Seriously? How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

[–] III@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

The American "education" system... that's how. Conservatives paid good money over the decades to build this level of general stupidity.

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I'll rotfl my mao off when this law will turn out to accidentally punish fossil fuel and chemical companies dispersing chemicals or substances into the atmosphere and altering weather, also known as climate change.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Caffeinated_Sloth@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is awesome. Do it. What’s gonna happen when the contrails don’t disappear? Who are they gonna arrest? Gonna have to stock up on popcorn because the theatre of the ignorant is about to get really interesting. Finally a piece of legislation I can get excited about.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 40 points 5 days ago (5 children)

This is a bill to arrest people trying to prevent climate change.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

So glad we handed over all levers of power to these morons.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh for fucks sake…. How can one woman be some incredibly dense?

She probably heard somewhere that is why there were flash floods in Texas because some evil genius is punishing “real Americans”.

The ironic thing is the GOP constant bashing of clean, renewable energy and promoting fossil fuels and coal really is affecting the weather, just not in a very predictable or controlled way.

[–] III@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

This is the same moron that has long believed that the Jews control space lasers that manipulate the weather.

I am surprised it took her this long to make a move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TechAnon@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

These aren't serious people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

All the fucking stupidest people. Every goddamn idiotic conspiracy theory is getting a pipeline straight to mainstream news outlets and a rep in government now. Instead of some stupid Bircher literature or having to stand out on the street and screech nonsense at passerby who could just ignore the crazy people...

I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

We already have the anti-vaxxer dumbfucks, the Qanon loons, the evolution-denying dipshits, what else is missing...? How about David Icke level bullshit about lizard people?

JFC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I thought she'd prioritize dealing with sharknado attacks but there we have it.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Immigrantnado!

The new conservative horror film

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

You're a genious. That is hilarious and my only upset is that I didn't think of it myself.

[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The only “weather modification machines” are fossil fuel powered energy plants. We should join together with MTG to outlaw them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 5 days ago

I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So go after the bullshit corpos releasing megatons of co2 into the atmosphere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago

Does this include using a sharpie to control a hurricane?

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 days ago (6 children)

So, she wants to ban "cloud seeding"?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Why is mtg still able to talk?

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

Next up is a bill to shoot every remaining unicorn

[–] d33pblu3g3n3@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Marjorie Taylor Green is such a waste of resources.

Ugly, dumb and vile.

And I bet she stinks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

Geoengineering… like fracking?

Or like building man-made lakes and tunnels? What about digging a pool in my backyard?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

If I could control the weather, this woman would never not be getting targeted by lightning. She'd have to run serpentine whenever she was outside to dodge all the lightning bolts aimed at her.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 days ago

Calm down Zeus. You're getting another unhealthy attraction to a mortal woman.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

She's attempting to ban Geoengineering. From Wikipedia:

Geoengineering (also known as climate engineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-caused climate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form of climate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion of sunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] the Royal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and the World Climate Research Programme.[1]

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Does it include the pollutants coming from her private jet ?

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Stop paying attention to her. Make sure the next thing you click on related to her, is footage of her murder.

load more comments
view more: next ›