Canon EF lens to Micro Four Thirds body: long link
ido-scharf
joined 1 year ago
I don't think it will be exactly that, but you can "enrol" in r/photoclass.
You can try Adobe Bridge.
I think they all have free trial options... So download one and try it.
This is basically what total equivalence tries to estimate. More on that here:
- https://sansmirror.com/articles/choosing-a-mirrorless-camer/equivalence-in-a-nutshell.html
- https://www.dpreview.com/articles/2666934640/what-is-equivalence-and-why-should-i-care (multi-page article)
Sensor can also differ in ways other than size, so it's best to test that theory when comparing specific cameras.
At the wide end of the zoom range (ignoring the difference in field of view for a moment), the aperture on the Canon (f/1.8) is bigger by 1.3 stops than on the Fujifilm (f/2.8). Now take a look at this comparison of test shots to examine noise in low light: long link. To my eyes, the ISO 3200 shot from the Canon looks noisier than the ISO 12800 shot from the Fujifilm, but cleaner than the ISO 25600 shot from the Fujifilm. So the sensor in the Fujifilm is more than two-stops better in low light, but less than three stops. Let's say it's 2.3.
So the Fujifilm kit is better in low light by (2.3 - 1.3 = ) 1 stop.
So no, they are not equal, despite being equivalent.
Do you see that lower resolution in the file details, or in your raw converter? If the former, maybe it's only the metadata that got tangled up somehow, or Finder is reading it differently. Try opening the file in your raw converter.
That's illegal.
I think Adobe offers a free trial period, so you can start there. After the trial period is over, and if you can't pay for the software, try some free, open source alternatives: https://pixls.us/software/