Maybe it would be easier if the earth would be flat :)
omxxi
You're doing a conversion when you ask that question. My point is, there is no gain, is just converting one system for another that requires the exact work. Then we'll have tables of "workzones per country" and we need to do the same conversion to setup a meeting.
That would be shifting from timezone to "workzone" or "noonzone". At this moment you need to setup a meeting with people, then you ask which is their timezone. With global UTC timezone, then you need to ask, which are your work hours? (workzone).
if you cannot decrypt the file, how can you know that the DMCA violation report is valid?
it requires to create an account
Thanks for sharing.
I did some tests and opened two issues in your github project.
Who are you?
This sounds really aggressive, he's tobi_tensei, that must be enough.
Even a known and respected cryptographer would not release a tool with such confidence
Why not? Do you know about open source? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
First you need to request testing and code review before you announce to people that it is a “secure, anonymous file-sharing platform.”
I think he's precisely asking for testing and code review, announcing the intention of the software is not wrong.
This is not a community for sharing your personal programming projects for feedback
Why not? It is related to privacy, it can be the seed for bigger projects, the author is sharing the code so you can evaluate and host yourself.
What a strange way to say "thanks for sharing".
So, I'm going to try to say it better:
Thanks @tobi_tensei for sharing that code in the open source, please don't stop your initiative for people criticizing, there are more people that likes and are thankful.
What about the education systems? One of those two countries is heavily denying basic science at schools, teaching creationism as something at the same level as evolutionism, letting religion pollute education, banning books from schools, teaching obsolete two genders theory, etc. Is the study short about the differences in education?
it was the same for me about Sandler until I saw Uncut Gems, finally he showed that he can act.
My point is that religious education trains the kids to believe things without verifying facts, even unbelievable fables. I'm just trying to point a potential source of what we know is a big problem.
This can be controversial, but my opinion is that religious education normally is the opposite of critical thinking. If you teach the kids to accept beliefs just based on faith, you're killing critical thinking.
Hasta la vista, baby