scintilla

Because no one wants the individual cost of going actively against MAGA. Sure you can be a nuisance if you stick it out but you could also have many personal consequences. Could end up dead later too based off how this admin is progressing.

I hope people remember that the problems in the US are not wholly unique and things that can't happen in other countries. It's another form of american exceptionalism to think that somehow Americans as a group of humans are worse than others. Look to the UK for proof of that. And look at what is happening in Australia and track it out to a longer period of time.

Edit: except for the guns obviously that is a pretty stupid thing here that other countries don't have but it's definitely not the sole problem.

You really are that guy.

As much as I am loath to defend the military. This is certainly being done by the civilians actually in charge of shit because there is no way in hell that a single smart person that has ever actually done anything military related even vaguely wants people like CK fans under their command. I heard some vile shit when I was in but if you said anything close to what he said you would be out faster than you could scream "but the first Amendment".

10 is fine not great but fine. 11 is just a shitty OS. I'm glad that they didn't force update you like I know happened to some people.

Don't say that. The arch fans will come to point out that Arch based isn't true Arch then put you to death for wasting their time.

You're using an NFT (or lookalike) profile picture. No one values your opinions.

I like the UI more. It has the web player when you pay and while you can self host something like it its more expensive in the long run if you value your time and don't enjoy it (so its not a fun hobby).

Where's the dipshit that said this had nothing to do with the first Amendment yesterday? I have a few questions for them.

Are they going to look into the judges face and say "your honour it is impossible for a gas stove to create a hazardous environment" and not get laughed out of the court house.

From what I've been reading it seems pretty likely they were sexually abused. Do you have any counter evidence? Even the judge in this said that the new evidence "slightly supports" the idea of abuse they just don't think that it would have resulted in a change to the outcome of the case.

I know this is satire but it really does need to be pointed out that the second section is basically what everyone in power at the DNC is saying about just letting them win.

Also cough cough newsom cough. As much as people on Lemmy seem to think he's a paragon of what a Democrat should be.